Face Detection via User Eye Location Input

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Face detection systems in image management applications often fail to detect faces in images due to orientation, obscuration, or focus issues, leading to missed detections and a diminished user experience.

Innovation Solution

User interaction, such as selecting eye locations for red-eye reduction, provides input to improve face detection by indicating potential face locations, which are then used to adjust detection parameters and facilitate subsequent face detection operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automated face detection operations are used to detect faces in images, then face detection can be performed automatically without user intervention, but faces may be missed due to orientation, obscuration, or focus issues (false negatives)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated face detectionVSAvoidface detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from user interactions (such as red-eye reduction selections) to improve and refine face detection results. When automated detection misses a face, user actions provide corrective feedback that triggers re-detection with adjusted parameters, thereby improving reliability while maintaining automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary face detection automatically before user interaction. This preliminary action identifies potential faces that can then be refined or corrected based on subsequent user feedback, allowing the system to maintain high automation while improving detection accuracy through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If face detection thresholds are set high to reduce false positives, then detection precision improves, but more faces are missed (increased false negatives)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveface detection precisionVSAvoidface detection completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts detection thresholds based on user interactions. Initially, high thresholds maintain precision, but when user actions indicate missed faces, the system lowers thresholds for re-detection in those specific regions, thereby maintaining overall precision while improving completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different detection thresholds to different regions of the image. High thresholds are maintained in regions where precision is critical, while user-induced adjustments create local zones with lower thresholds where faces were previously missed, allowing precision and completeness to coexist in different spatial locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If user interactions are monitored to improve face detection, then detection accuracy improves by capturing missed faces, but system complexity increases due to additional processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveface detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses user interactions that were originally intended for image enhancement (such as red-eye reduction) as dual-purpose signals for both image processing and face detection improvement. This multi-functionality allows the system to improve face detection accuracy without adding dedicated complex processing systems, as existing user interaction handling is repurposed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system leverages user interactions as self-provided feedback to improve its own detection accuracy. Rather than requiring external complex systems to identify missed faces, the user's natural interactions with the image serve as automatic indicators of where improvement is needed, reducing the need for additional complex processing infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9111130B2Facilitating face detection with user input
Publication Date: 2015.08.18 ZHIGU HLDG
  • US9111130B2 patent drawing
  • US9111130B2 patent drawing
  • US9111130B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more techniques and/or systems are disclosed for improving face detection in an image. A user may select a first eye location while viewing the image (e.g., per red-eye reduction) and a first indication of user input, comprising the location selected by the user, can be received. The first eye location in the image can then be used to determine a face location in the image (and a second user indicated eye location can be used as well). The location of the face can be identified in the image, and the image with the identified face location can be provided to a face detection and/or recognition operation, for example.