Face Pose Detection Reliability Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing face detection systems face challenges in accurately determining the pose of faces in images, particularly when multiple poses are detected from the same face, leading to low detection accuracy and slow processing speeds, and often produce multiple incorrect detection results.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that includes a detection section to identify face poses and a determination section to calculate the reliability of detection results, comparing them to determine the correct pose by adjusting detection window settings and using correction coefficients, thereby prioritizing detection results based on the input image type (still or moving).

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple face detectors (frontal, profile, etc.) are used to detect faces in various poses, then detection coverage is improved, but multiple detection results are generated from one face leading to determination difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoiddetermination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The determination section uses feedback mechanisms by calculating reliability scores for each detection result and using this information to select the most accurate pose. The system continuously refines its determination by comparing detection results across multiple detectors and using reliability feedback to resolve conflicts between overlapping detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The determination section acts as an intermediary between multiple face detectors and the final output. It receives detection results from various detectors, calculates reliabilities, and mediates the selection process by choosing the pose with the highest reliability, thus resolving the conflict between multiple detection results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single face detector learns all poses from enormous sample data, then all poses can be detected, but detection accuracy and speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepose detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The face detection system is segmented into multiple specialized detectors, each trained on specific pose types (frontal, profile, etc.). This segmentation allows each detector to achieve high accuracy for its specific pose type while maintaining comprehensive coverage through the combination of multiple detectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The determination section provides universal functionality by handling the selection of correct poses across all detection types. It serves as a multi-functional component that works with any combination of detectors and determines the correct pose regardless of which detector produced the detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a single face detector learns all poses from enormous sample data, then all poses can be detected, but detection speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepose detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the detection task into multiple specialized detectors, each detector can be optimized for its specific pose type with fewer training samples, reducing the computational burden per detector and improving overall detection speed while maintaining comprehensive pose coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each detector performs partial action by focusing on specific pose types rather than attempting to detect all poses. This partial specialization allows for faster, more efficient detection of each pose type, and the determination section combines these partial results to achieve complete pose detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple detection results are generated from one face, then all poses are captured, but it becomes problematic to determine which detection result is correct

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepose detection completenessVSAvoiddetection result reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The determination section implements feedback by calculating reliability scores for each detection result based on multiple factors including detection confidence, pose overlap analysis, and consistency with other detectors. This reliability feedback enables the system to identify and select the correct pose from multiple detection results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by introducing reliability scores as a new parameter to evaluate detection results. By calculating and comparing reliability parameters across multiple detection results, the system can objectively determine which pose detection is correct, transforming the subjective problem of pose selection into an objective parameter-based decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8428361B2Image processing apparatus for detecting a face
Publication Date: 2013.04.23 138 EAST LCD ADVANCEMENTS LTD
  • US8428361B2 patent drawing
  • US8428361B2 patent drawing
  • US8428361B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic image is received by a system to process the image for the presence of a face. The image is repeatedly electronically scanned using a plurality of windows for the presence of facial poses. A plurality of directional poses is detected during the scanning process. Reliabilities for each type of detected poses are calculated. The reliabilities are based on the amount of times the directional poses are detected during the scanning process and directions of the directional poses.