Component-Based Face Recognition Training Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Component-based face recognition systems face challenges in determining which facial components to use for training, as the selection of components significantly affects the system's accuracy in distinguishing between individuals, and existing methods rely on manual selection or lack robustness against pose changes and illumination variations.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a main program module, initialization, extraction, training, estimation, and growing modules determines the optimal component shape, size, and direction for expansion to maximize the accuracy of component recognition classifiers, automatically selecting components and iteratively growing them in four directions to enhance classification accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual selection of facial components is used for training, then the system can be implemented with existing methods, but the system lacks robustness against pose changes and illumination variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness against pose changes and illumination variationsVSAvoidautomatic component selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically selects and optimizes facial components for training without requiring manual intervention. The algorithm independently determines which components maximize recognition accuracy by evaluating component importance and selecting optimal training examples, enabling the system to self-configure and adapt to different conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts component selection parameters based on training data characteristics and recognition performance. By optimizing parameters such as component size, shape, and selection criteria, the system adapts to pose changes and illumination variations, improving robustness without manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the component size is increased to capture more facial features, then the recognition accuracy may improve, but the system becomes more sensitive to pose changes and illumination variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecognition accuracyVSAvoid sensitivity to pose changes and illumination variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system selects optimal component sizes that provide sufficient information for accurate recognition without excessive expansion that would increase sensitivity to pose and illumination changes. By carefully controlling the degree of component expansion, the system achieves a balance between capturing essential features and maintaining robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The component selection process is dynamic, allowing the system to adjust component size and shape based on the specific training data and recognition task. This adaptability enables the system to optimize recognition accuracy while maintaining robustness against pose and illumination variations through data-driven parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If more training examples are used to improve classifier accuracy, then the recognition performance improves, but the complexity of determining which components to use increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassifier accuracyVSAvoidcomponent selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from recognition performance evaluation to guide component selection. By continuously monitoring accuracy and adjusting component choices based on performance data, the system efficiently identifies optimal training components without exhaustive search, reducing selection complexity while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of training data to pre-identify promising components and examples before final selection. This preliminary sorting and filtering process reduces the complexity of determining which components to use, making the overall system more manageable while ensuring high-quality training examples are selected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7734071B2Systems and methods for training component-based object identification systems
Publication Date: 2010.06.08 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US7734071B2 patent drawing
  • US7734071B2 patent drawing
  • US7734071B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are presented that determine components to use as examples to train a component-based face recognition system. In one embodiment, an initial component shape and size is determined, a training set is built, a component recognition classifier is trained, and the accuracy of the classifier is estimated. The component is then temporarily grown in each of four directions (up, down, left, and right) and the effect on the classifier's accuracy is determined. The component is then grown in the direction that maximizes the classifier's accuracy. The process can be performed multiple times in order to maximize the classifier's accuracy.