Face Recognition Threshold Adjustment for Stable Match Rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Face recognition systems struggle with maintaining accurate positive determination rates under varying environmental conditions, leading to either false negatives or false positives due to static decision thresholds.

Innovation Solution

A system that automatically adjusts the decision threshold based on the current positive determination rate, increasing or decreasing it to maintain a target positive determination rate by dynamically adapting to environmental changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a static decision threshold is used for face recognition, then the system is simple to operate, but the positive determination rate becomes inaccurate under varying environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidpositive determination rate accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a static decision threshold to a dynamic one that automatically adjusts based on environmental conditions. The system monitors performance metrics and adapts the threshold in real-time, allowing the face recognition system to maintain accurate positive determination rates while remaining easy to operate through automated adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors face recognition performance and uses this information to adjust the decision threshold. This closed-loop approach ensures the threshold remains optimized for current environmental conditions, resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and determination accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the decision threshold is increased to reduce false positives, then the precision of positive determinations improves, but the number of false negatives increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of positive determinationsVSAvoidfalse negative rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the decision threshold based on real-time performance monitoring. When false positives are detected, the threshold is increased to improve precision; when false negatives increase, the threshold is decreased to reduce missed detections. This dynamic adaptation resolves the trade-off between precision and false negative rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the decision threshold parameter automatically based on system performance and environmental conditions. By adjusting this critical parameter in response to monitored metrics, the system optimizes the balance between precision of positive determinations and the rate of false negatives, resolving the technical contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the decision threshold is decreased to reduce false negatives, then the sensitivity of face recognition improves, but the number of false positives increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse negative rateVSAvoidprecision of positive determinations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from performance monitoring to automatically adjust the decision threshold. When false negatives are detected, the threshold is decreased to improve sensitivity; when false positives increase, the threshold is increased to improve precision. This feedback-driven adjustment resolves the contradiction between false negative rate and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If a fixed decision threshold is used, then the system complexity is low, but the system cannot adapt to changing environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidadaptability to environmental conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically monitoring its own performance and modifying the decision threshold without external intervention. This self-service capability enables the system to adapt to changing environmental conditions while maintaining relatively low complexity, as the adjustment process is automated rather than requiring manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the static decision threshold into a dynamic parameter that automatically adapts to environmental changes. This dynamic approach enables the system to maintain high adaptability while keeping complexity manageable through automated adjustment mechanisms that respond to monitored performance metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250349155A1Face recognition using an automatically adjusting decision threshold
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 LENOVO ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
  • US20250349155A1 patent drawing
  • US20250349155A1 patent drawing
  • US20250349155A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer program product and a method perform various operations including: capturing face images of people at a particular location during a current period; performing, for each of the face images captured during the current period, face recognition using a value of a decision threshold to make a determination whether the captured face image and a stored face image in a database of stored face images are of the same person; calculating a current positive determination rate for the face images captured during the current period; and automatically adjusting the value of the decision threshold for performing the face recognition during a subsequent period following the current period. The value of the decision threshold is increased (decreased) for performing the face recognition during the subsequent period in response to the current positive determination rate being greater than (less than) a target positive determination rate during the current period.