Faceguard Retaining Device with Shock-Absorbing Grommet

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing faceguard attachment systems for helmets are either difficult to quickly release in emergency situations or lack sufficient shock absorption, posing safety risks during impacts.

Innovation Solution

A quick-release faceguard retaining device featuring a cooperating base and latch with a shock-absorbing grommet and a softer shock stabilizer, along with a hinged latch and C-shaped clip for secure and rapid deployment, utilizing materials like SURLYN and thermoplastic polymer for enhanced safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a locking-arm-and-latch structure is used to secure the faceguard, then the faceguard is securely attached to the helmet, but the structure can break under impact force causing the faceguard to fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from hard rigid materials to soft compliant materials. The base and latch are made of soft compliant material that can deform under impact force, preventing structural failure while maintaining attachment security. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by allowing the attachment to remain both strong and impact-resistant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite construction with a hard shell outer layer and soft compliant material inner structure. This composite approach allows the external hard shell to resist impact forces while the internal soft material provides compliance and prevents catastrophic failure, simultaneously achieving both strength and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If a rigid attachment structure is used, then the faceguard is securely held, but there is no shock absorption capability during impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurement strengthVSAvoidshock impact
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from rigid to soft compliant, enabling the attachment structure to absorb shock through deformation. The soft material dissipates impact energy through viscoelastic damping, preventing shock transmission to the faceguard and helmet while maintaining secure attachment during normal use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates soft compliant material throughout the attachment structure that acts as a cushion before impact occurs. This material is pre-positioned to absorb and distribute impact forces, providing beforehand cushioning that protects against shock damage while maintaining attachment integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Ease of operation

If the entire helmet shell is removed to access the player's face, then medical personnel can treat the player, but head and neck movement is avoided which is critical in suspected brain or spinal injury cases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveface accessVSAvoidhead and neck movement risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the faceguard attachment from the helmet shell, allowing the faceguard to be independently removed while the helmet shell remains in place. This segmentation enables medical personnel to access the player's face by removing only the faceguard, avoiding the need to remove the entire helmet and thus preventing harmful head and neck movement in suspected brain or spinal injury cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If a complex locking mechanism is used to secure the faceguard, then the attachment is secure, but rapid release becomes difficult in emergency situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidrelease time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a self-latching mechanism where the soft compliant material automatically engages with the faceguard wire to secure it in place. For release, the user simply pulls the faceguard wire, which automatically disengages from the soft material without requiring manipulation of complex locking components. This self-service mechanism maintains secure attachment during normal use while enabling rapid release in emergencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the complex locking mechanism from the attachment system, replacing it with a simple friction-based hold using soft compliant material. The faceguard wire is held securely by the deformable material without requiring locks, latches, or clips, allowing for both secure attachment and rapid release by simply pulling the wire free.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device provides secure attachment while allowing rapid release of the faceguard without removing the helmet shell, offering improved shock absorption and safety by distributing impact forces effectively.

Implementation Method 1

The device includes a grommet located in the opening of the base and a shock stabilizer located in a shock stabilizer-receiving groove of the base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

the shock stabilizer is of a softer material than the base... Upon impact there is no 'give' in the device and such is important for allowing for effective absorption of impact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS9265297B2Face guard retaining device
Publication Date: 2016.02.23 SCHUTT SPORTS IP LLC
  • US9265297B2 patent drawing
  • US9265297B2 patent drawing
  • US9265297B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A quick-release retaining device for securing a faceguard to a helmet shell. A selectively engageable latch structure maintains the retaining device in a closed condition. When the retaining device is urged to the open condition, the faceguard may be moved away from a wearer's face. The device is biased in the closed condition by a C-shaped clip, and has a sliding-bar feature for additional securement. The sliding bar is further secured by a locking pin.