Shock Absorber for Sports Faceguard

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing headgear with shock absorbing faceguards is not robust, compact, unobtrusive, or adaptable enough to effectively reduce the risk of head and neck injuries from frontal impacts in sports, and lacks a protected mounting location for the shock absorber.

Innovation Solution

A shock absorber system comprising a support structure, guide rod, sliding member, and resilient member, such as a coil spring, that supports the faceguard relative to the head-engaging member, allowing for rectilinear movement to absorb impact energy and cushion blows, with the shock absorber being securely attached to either the faceguard or head-engaging member.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional rigid headgear with facemask is used, then structural strength and rigidity are maintained, but impact energy is not effectively absorbed and injury risk remains high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidimpact energy transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the rigid, static headgear structure into a dynamic system with movable components. The faceguard is coupled to the headgear body through shock-absorbing mechanisms that allow controlled movement and deformation during impact, enabling the structure to adapt dynamically to external forces and dissipate impact energy through mechanical work rather than rigid resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates shock-absorbing elements and cushioning mechanisms in advance within the headgear structure. These pre-installed energy-dissipating components are positioned to intercept and absorb impact energy before it reaches the wearer's head, providing proactive protection rather than reactive response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If shock absorbing elements are added to the faceguard, then impact energy absorption is improved, but the device becomes less robust and more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the headgear into distinct functional modules: a headgear body, a faceguard assembly, and intermediate shock-absorbing coupling mechanisms. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently - the faceguard maintains its protective function while the coupling mechanisms provide specialized shock absorption capabilities without complicating the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate shock-absorbing mechanisms as mediators between the faceguard and the headgear body. These intermediary components serve as dedicated energy-dissipating elements that simplify the overall design by concentrating the shock absorption function in specific, well-defined locations rather than distributing complexity throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Volume of moving object

If the shock absorber is made compact and unobtrusive, then wearability and aesthetics are improved, but the energy absorption capacity may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorber volumeVSAvoidimpact energy absorption capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes shock-absorbing materials and mechanisms with variable properties that can adapt their characteristics based on operating conditions. The shock-absorbing elements are designed to remain compact under normal conditions but can undergo controlled deformation or activate energy-dissipating mechanisms when subjected to impact forces, effectively changing their physical parameters in response to external stimuli.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The shock absorber effectively reduces the severity of impact by compressing the resilient member, thereby minimizing the transmission of impact energy to the wearer's head, providing enhanced protection and reducing the risk of injury.

Implementation Method 1

the resilient member is a coil spring that is provided on the guide rod between the sliding member and the second end portion of the guide rod

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the resilient member, in this case the coil spring, can absorb at least a portion of the impact energy of the object and cushion the blow to the faceguard

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10912345B2Mask
Publication Date: 2021.02.09 F3 TECH LLC
  • US10912345B2 patent drawing
  • US10912345B2 patent drawing
  • US10912345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A shock absorber, for use with headgear having a faceguard, has a sliding member that does not extend beyond the support structure of the shock absorber in a way that would leave it vulnerable to damage. A headgear having a faceguard provides a protected mounting location for mounting a shock absorber for the faceguard.