Splash Resistant Facemask Layer Stiffness and Weight Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing face masks struggle to provide sufficient splash resistance while maintaining breathability, as increasing thickness or reducing pore size compromises airflow and moisture transfer, and fluorocarbon treatments raise safety and environmental concerns.

Innovation Solution

A face mask design featuring a first and second spunbond splash layer, a meltblown filtration layer, and an inner polyester cellulose wetlaid layer, all without repellent treatments, which achieves high air permeability and splash resistance through specific weight and stiffness criteria, passing ASTM F1862-05 Level 3 splash resistance testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If more layers or thicker layers are added to increase splash resistance, then fluid penetration resistance is improved, but air permeability and breathability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesplash resistanceVSAvoidair flow
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the splash layer by controlling basis weight (23.7-30.5 gsm) and drape stiffness (above 3.5) to achieve optimal balance between splash resistance and breathability without adding excessive thickness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The mask uses a composite structure with multiple layers including spunbond splash layers, meltblown filtration layers, and wetlaid inner layers, where each layer contributes specific properties to achieve both splash resistance and air permeability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If pore size is reduced to improve splash resistance, then fluid penetration resistance is improved, but air permeability and moisture transfer deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesplash resistanceVSAvoidbreathability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Different layers are assigned different local qualities: the splash layers have specific stiffness and weight properties for fluid resistance, while the inner wetlaid layer provides comfort and moisture management, allowing each zone to optimize its function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent specifies precise parameter ranges for splash layers (basis weight 23.7-30.5 gsm, drape stiffness above 3.5) to achieve the right balance between pore structure for fluid resistance and air permeability for breathability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If fluorocarbon treatments are applied to enhance splash resistance, then fluid penetration resistance is improved, but safety and environmental compatibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesplash resistanceVSAvoidsafety concerns
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes fluorocarbon treatments from the mask construction entirely, achieving splash resistance through the physical structure and properties of the spunbond and wetlaid layers without harmful chemical coatings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mask uses disposable nonwoven layers with inherent splash resistance properties that do not require persistent chemical treatments, aligning with safer, treatment-free medical PPE

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mask effectively resists fluid penetration while maintaining breathability, absorbing more fluid and reducing interaction with the filter layer, ensuring comfort and safety without using fluorocarbon treatments.

Implementation Method 1

The challenge in providing splash resistance to face masks is to maintain an acceptable level of breathability while prohibiting splashes as well as minute airborne (virus) particles from passing through the mask

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary pressure: Capillary Pressure

Implementation Method 2

Fluorochemical repellents are unique in that they confer both water and low surface tension fluids repellent to fabrics. This property is important because blood and alcohol, common liquids in an operating room, are low surface tension liquids.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 3

a meltblown filtration layer (24) and an inner layer (22) suitable for contact with the wearer's face

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical filtration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 4

the heat and moisture from expired air creates micro-climates between the exterior of the mask and the covered skin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP2654472B1Splash resistant facemask
Publication Date: 2016.08.03 AVENT INC
  • EP2654472B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2654472B1 patent drawing
  • EP2654472B1 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a splash resistant facemask having two outer splash layers adjacent each other on a side away from a wearer, a filter layer and an inside layer. None of the layers contains a repellent treatment. The facemask can pass a fluid splash resistance test, e.g. ASTM F-1862-05, wherein fluid is directed at the mask at a pressure of 160 mmHg.