Automated Facet Analysis via Pattern Augmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated facet analysis systems are labor-intensive and rely heavily on human cognition, struggling with complexity and scalability, as they lack universal patterns or heuristics that can apply across all information domains, leading to slow and costly classification processes and an inability to connect disparate domains effectively.

Innovation Solution

The system performs facet analysis using pattern augmentation and statistical analyses to discover facets, facet attributes, and facet attribute hierarchies in input information, enabling the identification of patterns of facet attribute relationships, and employs a complex-adaptive system to refine classifications over time through user interactions, allowing for decentralized and dynamic classification schemes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated facet analysis systems are used, then productivity should improve, but they remain labor-intensive and rely heavily on human cognition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification speedVSAvoidhuman input requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing users to contribute classification data in a decentralized manner without requiring centralized control or authority. Users can input data ad hoc from their local contexts, and the system automatically aggregates and processes this data to build classification schemes autonomously, reducing the need for human cognition in the analysis process while maintaining user involvement in data provision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual human analysis mechanisms with automated computational systems that use pattern recognition algorithms, statistical analyses, and machine learning to discover facets and attributes. This substitution of mechanical (human) processing with automated computational processes increases productivity while reducing direct human input requirements in the classification analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If human experts perform facet analysis, then measurement precision should be high, but the process becomes slow and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidclassification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates copies of human expert knowledge by training machine learning models on data provided by human experts. Once trained, these models can perform classification tasks autonomously at high speed, replicating the precision of human experts without the time cost. The models learn patterns from expert-labeled data and can apply these patterns to new classification tasks rapidly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where users can correct or refine automated classification results. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from user corrections and improve its accuracy over time, maintaining high measurement precision while operating at automated speed. The feedback mechanism bridges the gap between automated processing and human expertise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If universal classification schemes are applied, then ease of operation should improve, but adaptability to specific domains decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification simplicityVSAvoiddomain-specific customization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the classification task into two parts: a universal framework that provides the basic structure and operations, and domain-specific components that are automatically adapted. The universal portion handles common operations and data structures, while the system automatically generates domain-specific facets and attributes through pattern recognition, allowing easy operation through standardized interfaces while adapting to specific domain requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The classification scheme is made dynamic rather than static, allowing it to automatically adapt to different domains. The system uses machine learning to learn domain-specific patterns from input data and dynamically adjusts the classification structure accordingly. This dynamic adaptation maintains ease of operation through automated adjustment while achieving high adaptability to various domains without manual reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If centralized control is used in hybrid systems, then reliability should improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification consistencyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system eliminates centralized control by enabling decentralized self-service where each user can independently contribute data and the system automatically aggregates results. This distributed approach maintains reliability through consistent automated processing while reducing device complexity by removing the need for centralized control infrastructure and authority mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the functions of centralized control and decentralized user contribution into a unified automated processing framework. By combining these functions, the system achieves the reliability of centralized coordination without the complexity of centralized control structures, as the merging is handled automatically through the machine learning and data aggregation processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS7860817B2System, method and computer program for facet analysis
Publication Date: 2010.12.28 PRIMAL FUSION INC
  • US7860817B2 patent drawing
  • US7860817B2 patent drawing
  • US7860817B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated facet analysis of input information selected from a domain of information in accordance with a source data structure is described. Facet analysis may proceed by discovering at least one of facets, facet attributes, and facet attribute hierarchies of the input information using pattern augmentation and statistical analyses to identify patterns of facet attribute relationships in the input information.