Automated System Configuration Evaluation Using Facet Models
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing automated system design technologies struggle to effectively evaluate system performance and operation in real environments, as they lack the capability to incorporate information from facets such as processing flow and task flow during the concretization process.
Innovation Solution
An automated system design apparatus and method that generates configuration proposals, concretizes facet models related to features like processing flow and task flow, and evaluates these proposals using generated information to ensure system performance and operation meet specified criteria.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If automated design technology generates configuration proposals through repeated concretization operations, then configuration information can be derived efficiently, but the ability to evaluate performance and operational feasibility in real-time is insufficient
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining facet models that represent performance and operational characteristics before the actual configuration derivation process. These facet models (including processing flow models, task flow models, and security models) are prepared in advance so that when configuration proposals are generated, their performance and operational feasibility can be evaluated immediately without requiring separate real-world testing, thus resolving the contradiction between efficient derivation and reliable evaluation
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces facet models as intermediary representations that mediate between configuration proposals and performance evaluation. Instead of directly testing configurations in real environments, the facet models serve as intermediate artifacts that capture essential performance and operational characteristics, enabling realistic evaluation during the design phase while maintaining derivation efficiency
2Measurement precision
If comprehensive information from various facets is collected to evaluate system performance, then evaluation accuracy improves, but the complexity of the design process increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies segmentation by dividing the comprehensive evaluation into distinct facet models: processing flow facet models for performance evaluation, task flow facet models for operational feasibility, and security facet models for security assessment. Each facet model focuses on specific aspects of system behavior, allowing accurate multi-dimensional evaluation while keeping each individual model manageable and avoiding overwhelming complexity
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses parameter changes by representing system characteristics through configurable parameters within facet models rather than fixed complex structures. The facet models accept configuration parameters and generate evaluation results dynamically, allowing the same model framework to evaluate different configuration proposals by simply changing input parameters, thus maintaining accuracy while reducing structural complexity
Data Source
AI summary
An automated system design apparatus provided with configuration proposal generator generates a configuration proposal for a system concretized from abstract requirements for the system; facet model generator concretizes a model relating to a feature, the feature being required in the system from a facet other than a configuration of the system; and evaluator generates information required for evaluation of the configuration proposal based on the concretized model, and for evaluating the configuration proposal based on the information.


