Faceted Classification Synthesis Using Polyhedral Knowledge Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated faceted classification systems are limited by fragmented structures, making visualization and integration of multiple facets difficult, and lack flexibility in revising underlying facets, leading to errors in classification schemes.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for performing faceted classification synthesis that expresses dimensional concept relationships between concept definitions, allowing for the examination of explicit and implicit relationships between facet attributes to dynamically construct and revise facets, enabling more intuitive and flexible classification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional faceted classification methods are used, then multiple perspectives can be provided, but the structure becomes fragmented and visualization becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemultiple perspectivesVSAvoidfragmented structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple facet hierarchies into a unified polyhedral knowledge representation model where facets are organized in a multi-dimensional structure. This integration allows multiple perspectives to be maintained while providing a cohesive overall framework that improves visualization and reduces fragmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a multi-dimensional polyhedral structure to represent facets and their relationships. By organizing facets in higher dimensions rather than traditional linear hierarchies, the system can represent multiple perspectives simultaneously while maintaining an intuitive navigational structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If traditional faceted classification structures are used, then classification can be performed, but flexibility to revise underlying facets is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification capabilityVSAvoidflexibility to revise facets
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic knowledge representation model where facets and their relationships can be easily added, modified, or removed. The polyhedral structure allows for flexible revision of underlying facets without disrupting the entire classification system, enabling adaptive evolution of the classification scheme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If fragmented facet hierarchies are used, then classification can be performed, but integration and holistic perspective are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification operationVSAvoidintegration of facets
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal polyhedral knowledge representation model that serves multiple functions: it provides the structural framework for classification, maintains relationships between facets, enables holistic perspective, and facilitates navigation. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate integration mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7844565B2System, method and computer program for using a multi-tiered knowledge representation model
Publication Date: 2010.11.30 PRIMAL FUSION INC
  • US7844565B2 patent drawing
  • US7844565B2 patent drawing
  • US7844565B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method (system and computer program product) performs facet classification synthesis to relate concepts represented by concept definitions defined in accordance with a faceted data set comprising facets, facet attributes, and facet attributes hierarchies. Dimensional concept relationships are expressed between the concept definitions. Two concept definitions are determined to be related in a particular dimensional concept relationship by examining whether at least one of explicit relationships and implicit relationships exist in the faceted data set between the respective facet attributes of the two concept definitions.