Facial Analysis Platform for Safe Cosmetic Injection Protocols

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing number of cosmetic procedures, particularly facial injectables, poses risks of serious complications such as stroke and blindness due to the wide range of practitioner backgrounds and potential for permanent damage from soft tissue fillers, necessitating improved aesthetic outcomes and patient safety.

Innovation Solution

A computing platform utilizing machine learning and facial recognition to analyze images and create treatment plans, combining expertise from plastic surgeons, dermatologists, and other specialists to provide safe and accurate injection protocols, recommending appropriate products, sequences, and techniques while assessing facial anatomy and potential complications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If cosmetic procedures are performed by practitioners with diverse backgrounds (including non-physicians), then accessibility and availability of treatments increase, but patient safety and aesthetic outcomes deteriorate due to lack of proper training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of cosmetic proceduresVSAvoidpatient safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a computing platform as an intermediary system that mediates between practitioners of varying skill levels and safe treatment outcomes. The platform provides computer-generated treatment plans, real-time guidance during procedures, and automated safety checks that act as a mediator to ensure proper technique even when the practitioner lacks extensive training. This resolves the contradiction by allowing broader access while maintaining safety through the intermediary technological system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback mechanisms including real-time monitoring of injection parameters, automated alerts when safety thresholds are approached, and post-procedure outcome tracking. This feedback loop enables practitioners with diverse backgrounds to receive immediate guidance and correction, ensuring safety standards are maintained while allowing broader participation in cosmetic procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If soft tissue fillers are used to achieve aesthetic enhancement, then cosmetic outcomes are improved, but risk of serious complications (stroke, blindness, permanent damage) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic outcome qualityVSAvoidrisk of complications
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating comprehensive treatment plans before the actual injection procedure. These plans include detailed anatomical mapping, identification of high-risk areas, selection of appropriate products and volumes, and step-by-step procedural guidance. By preparing all safety measures and treatment parameters in advance, the system enables aesthetic enhancement while pre-emptively mitigating risks of stroke, blindness, and permanent damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary anti-action through automated safety checks and real-time monitoring that actively prevent harmful outcomes before they occur. The system monitors injection depth, pressure, and anatomical boundaries, and automatically alerts or stops the procedure when approaching dangerous zones. This preliminary counter-action to potential harm allows safe use of soft tissue fillers while maintaining high aesthetic quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Reliability

If machine learning algorithms are used to create treatment plans, then aesthetic outcomes and safety are improved, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment safetyVSAvoidcomputing platform complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing platform is designed as a universal system that performs multiple functions: facial analysis, treatment planning, real-time guidance, safety monitoring, and outcome tracking. By consolidating these diverse functions into a single multi-functional platform, the system achieves high reliability through machine learning while managing complexity through integration rather than separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning algorithms operate autonomously to generate treatment plans and provide real-time guidance without requiring constant human intervention or complex manual configuration. The system self-adjusts parameters, automatically identifies anatomical features, and adapts to individual patient characteristics, reducing the operational complexity burden on practitioners while maintaining high safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11123140B1Computing platform for improved aesthetic outcomes and patient safety in medical and surgical cosmetic procedures
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 SWEIS ILIANA E
  • US11123140B1 patent drawing
  • US11123140B1 patent drawing
  • US11123140B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic computing system creates a treatment plan and provides safe and accurate treatment recommendations by obtaining an input image of a face; comparing, using a pattern recognition process, one or more aspects of the input image to corresponding aspects of a plurality of reference images; obtaining, based on a result of the comparing, supplemental information associated with one or more additional characteristics of the face; and creating a treatment plan based on the input image and the additional characteristic.