Facial Image Anonymization Preserving Expression Features

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for developing automatic facial expression recognition systems face challenges due to the lack of diverse and labeled facial images, often resulting in overfitting when using images of similar-looking individuals, and the labor-intensive process of labeling images for training, which can be mitigated by anonymizing facial images while preserving emotional expressions.

Innovation Solution

The method involves encoding original facial images into feature sets that separate personal identity and expression components, applying a perturbation transform to obscure personal identity while preserving expression components, and decoding these feature sets to generate anonymized images that can be used for training facial expression recognition systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If facial images are anonymized to protect subject identity, then privacy protection is improved, but facial expression information may be lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidfacial expression information
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the facial image into distinct feature components: identity features (e.g., facial structure, geometry) and expression features (e.g., muscle movements, emotional cues). The anonymization process selectively pertains only the identity features while leaving expression features intact, allowing the system to differentiate between these two types of information and apply differential processing accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by applying different levels of perturbation to different regions of the facial image. Identity-critical regions (such as facial contours and bone structure) receive strong perturbation to ensure anonymization, while expression-relevant regions (such as muscle movements and facial gestures) receive minimal or no perturbation to preserve expression information for training purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If a large diverse training set is collected from the internet, then training data diversity is improved, but labeling labor intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data diversityVSAvoidlabeling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables self-service by using the anonymization system to automatically generate diverse training data from a small set of original images. The system applies perturbation transforms to create multiple anonymized variations of each original image, effectively multiplying the training data volume without requiring proportional increases in human labeling effort, as the anonymized images inherit labels from the original images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating multiple synthetic copies of the original facial images through perturbation transforms. Each copy is a modified version that preserves expression information while altering identity features, allowing the system to generate a large diverse training set by copying and transforming a small number of original images rather than collecting many unique images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If images of similar-looking people are used for training, then data collection is simplified, but model overfitting increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection easeVSAvoidmodel generalization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying multiple parameters of the facial images through perturbation transforms. These parameters include but are not limited to: lighting conditions, image quality, facial expression intensity, and anonymization strength. By changing these parameters across multiple generated images, the system creates diverse training data that prevents overfitting while maintaining ease of data collection from a small original set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9639743B2Anonymization of facial images
Publication Date: 2017.05.02 APPLE INC
  • US9639743B2 patent drawing
  • US9639743B2 patent drawing
  • US9639743B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method facilitates the use of facial images through anonymization of facial images, thereby allowing people to submit their own facial images without divulging their identities. Original facial images are accessed and perturbed to generate synthesized facial images. Personal identities contained in the original facial images are no longer discernable from the synthesized facial images. At the same time, each synthesized facial image preserves at least some of the original attributes of the corresponding original facial image.