Facial Image Authentication Using Gaze-Head Angle Differences

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing facial recognition technologies are vulnerable to spoofing attacks, particularly using three-dimensional masks, which can falsely authenticate individuals, compromising security and access control.

Innovation Solution

An image processing device and method that calculates the gaze angle and head angle of a subject from captured images and determines authenticity based on the difference between these angles to differentiate between a living person and a spoof, using a pre-determined threshold to grant or deny access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If facial recognition is used for security purposes, then access control is enabled, but the system becomes vulnerable to spoofing attacks using photographs, video images, masks, or three-dimensional objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidspoofing vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static image recognition to dynamic analysis by capturing multiple images over time and analyzing temporal changes in gaze angle and head angle. This dynamic approach allows the system to detect living subjects who can naturally move their eyes and head, while rejecting static spoofing materials like photographs and masks that cannot exhibit such dynamic behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimensional parameter for authentication by calculating the difference between gaze angle and head angle. This angular difference dimension provides an additional layer of verification beyond traditional facial feature matching, enabling the system to distinguish between living subjects and spoofing attempts based on the geometric relationship between eye orientation and head orientation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If multiple images are captured and analyzed for spoof detection, then authentication accuracy is improved, but processing complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthenticity detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential features needed for spoof detection by calculating gaze angle and head angle from captured images, then focusing analysis on the difference between these two angles. This extraction approach simplifies processing by isolating the critical authentication parameter (angular difference) from the full complexity of multiple image features, reducing computational burden while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12499714B2Image processing device, image processing method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 NEC CORP
  • US12499714B2 patent drawing
  • US12499714B2 patent drawing
  • US12499714B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing device includes a receiver configured to receive a plurality of images of a subject from a camera; and a processor configured to: calculate, for each of the plurality of images, an angle difference between a gaze angle and a head angle of the subject to obtain a series of angle differences; and determine an authenticity of the subject at least based on the series of angle differences.