Facial Recognition Document Access Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing document security mechanisms are unable to trace which user has read specific sections of a document and allow unauthorized individuals to access restricted sections.

Innovation Solution

Implementing facial recognition technology to identify users and track access at a character level by using a computing device to capture and process facial images, integrating machine learning to determine user identities and assign access privileges on a real-time basis, and utilizing eye gaze detection to manage access to document sections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If facial recognition and machine learning are implemented to identify users and track access in real-time, then document security and user identification accuracy are improved, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing and processing facial images before document access is granted. The facial recognition database is pre-populated with user facial data, and the machine learning model is trained in advance to recognize patterns. This allows real-time identification without compromising security while managing complexity through pre-computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy of the user's facial features by generating a computerized image and comparing it against stored facial recognition data. This copying approach enables accurate identification without requiring physical presence verification, reducing system complexity while maintaining high reliability for security purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If access tracking is implemented at the character level with facial recognition, then measurement precision of user interactions is improved, but loss of time for processing and data management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction tracking precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous facial recognition processing throughout the document interaction session. Instead of periodic checks, the machine learning model continuously analyzes facial images to track user identity and associated character-level interactions in real-time. This continuous action eliminates gaps in tracking precision while optimizing processing time through sustained analysis rather than repeated full scans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical or manual tracking methods with automated machine learning-based facial recognition. This substitution enables precise character-level tracking of user interactions without manual intervention, achieving high measurement precision while reducing time loss through automated processing of facial features and document interaction data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If real-time facial feature processing is used to monitor document access, then security control over document sections is improved, but use of energy and computational resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity controlVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing facial recognition processing only on relevant facial features necessary for identification rather than analyzing all image data. The machine learning model processes only the essential facial characteristics needed for security verification, achieving effective security control while reducing computational energy consumption by avoiding excessive processing of unnecessary data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Measurement precision

If facial recognition database comparison is performed for each user access attempt, then user identification accuracy is improved, but productivity and speed of access are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser identification accuracyVSAvoiddocument access speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and storing facial recognition data in an optimized database structure before access attempts occur. Facial features are extracted and organized in advance, allowing rapid comparison during actual access attempts. This preliminary preparation maintains high identification accuracy while significantly improving access speed and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies of facial recognition data that can be quickly compared against new facial images. Instead of performing complex full-face analysis for each access attempt, the system uses pre-generated facial feature copies that enable rapid matching while maintaining accurate user identification. This copying mechanism balances identification precision with access productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11651097B2Document security enhancement
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11651097B2 patent drawing
  • US11651097B2 patent drawing
  • US11651097B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of providing, by a computing device, access to a user of sections of an electronic document. The method includes receiving, by a computing device, a computerized image of a user accessing an electronic document. The computing device further accesses a facial recognition database and compares the computerized image to one or more entries in the facial recognition database to determine an identity of the user. The user is provided access to one or more sections of the electronic document based upon the identity of the user.