Facility Alert Response Guidance Using Verified Action History
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Operators in facilities face challenges in quickly determining appropriate responses to alerts issued by sensors, particularly inexperienced operators who need to assess potential non-conformities and take corrective actions within short timeframes.
Innovation Solution
An operation assistance method and system that analyzes alert histories, operational actions, and facility states to provide recommended responses. This involves detecting alerts, extracting relevant historical data, verifying the influence of past operational actions, and presenting prioritized operational actions to address non-conformities effectively.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If operators manually analyze sensor data and operational information to determine appropriate responses to alerts, then decision-making autonomy is maintained, but response time increases and inexperienced operators may make incorrect decisions
Solution Approach 1:
The system introduces an automated analysis intermediary that processes sensor data, alert history, and operational information to generate recommended actions. This intermediary assists operators by providing pre-analyzed recommendations while they retain final decision authority, thus improving response speed and accuracy without completely removing human judgment
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary analysis of operational data and alert patterns before the operator needs to make a decision. By pre-processing information and generating recommended actions in advance, the system reduces the cognitive load and decision time required during actual alert response situations
2Reliability
If comprehensive operational data and historical information are analyzed to provide accurate recommendations, then decision quality improves, but system complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments the complex analysis task into distinct functional modules: alert detection unit, history extraction unit, operational data analysis unit, and recommendation generation unit. Each module handles a specific aspect of the analysis, making the overall system more manageable and maintainable while comprehensively processing operational data
3Adaptability or versatility
If the system presents multiple recommended operational actions for different non-conformity events, then comprehensive coverage is achieved, but information overload occurs making it difficult to identify the most appropriate action
Solution Approach 1:
The system applies local quality by providing different levels of recommendation detail based on the specific alert context. For each recommended action, it highlights the most relevant information and prioritizes actions based on their likelihood of addressing the actual non-conformity, making the information more tailored and easier to process
Data Source
AI summary
An operation assistance method for presenting a recommended operational action in response to an alert issued in a facility includes: detecting issuance of the alert; extracting, from an alert history storage unit, an issuance history of a same type of alert as the alert of which the issuance or the sign of issuance has been detected; extracting, from an operation history storage unit storing an operation history of the facility, an operational action after issuance of the same type of alert; extracting, from an operational data storage unit storing information indicating an operational state of the facility, information indicating the operational state after the operational action, and verifying an influence of the operational action on the operational state; and presenting the recommended operational action in response to the alert of which the issuance has been detected, based on the extracted operational action and the verified influence.