Production Facility Health Assessment Using Component-Based ML

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional models fail to provide an accurate assessment of the overall health of a production facility, as they focus only on individual components without considering their impact on the facility's overall health.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing machine-learning (ML) models trained on physical properties and expert-defined health levels of facility components to determine the overall health, incorporating equations and weights to assess the contributions of individual components to the facility's health.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional models are used to assess facility health, then individual component health can be determined, but the overall facility health cannot be accurately assessed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefacility health assessment accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The facility is segmented into multiple components, each with its own health indicators. The ML model processes individual component data separately and then integrates them to determine overall facility health, enabling precise assessment without requiring a single complex monolithic model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A machine learning model acts as an intermediary between individual component health data and overall facility health assessment. The ML model synthesizes component-level information into facility-level insights, resolving the contradiction between detailed component analysis and holistic facility evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Extent of automation

If machine learning models are trained on historical data, then automated health determination is achieved, but initial data collection and model training time is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehealth determination automationVSAvoidmodel training time
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Historical data is collected and the ML model is trained in advance during a preliminary phase. Once trained, the model provides automated real-time health assessments without requiring further training, converting initial time investment into ongoing automation benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static manual assessment process to a dynamic automated system. The ML model adapts to new data patterns over time while providing continuous automated health determination, balancing the initial training time requirement with long-term automation gains

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260049900A1Assessing the health of a production facility
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20260049900A1 patent drawing
  • US20260049900A1 patent drawing
  • US20260049900A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a health of a production facility includes receiving first input data including (1) physical properties of components within the production facility at a plurality of different times and (2) the health of the production facility at the different times. The method also includes training a machine-learning (ML) model based upon the first input data to produce a trained ML model. The method also includes receiving second input data. The second input data is measured and/or received after the ML model is trained. The second input data includes the physical properties of the components within the production facility. The method also includes determining the health of the production facility using the trained ML model based upon the second input data.