Facility Management Support for Opportunity Loss Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current facility management systems struggle to efficiently understand and address opportunity loss in large-scale store management, as existing technologies can only determine the status of opportunity loss at individual sales floors and not the entire store, leading to reduced operational efficiency and difficulty in identifying areas for improvement.

Innovation Solution

A facility management support apparatus and system that integrates video capture, statistical information generation, and display output to provide a comprehensive view of opportunity loss across multiple facilities, allowing for detailed analysis and identification of attention timeslots and areas for improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the supervisor checks display contents for each sales floor individually to understand opportunity loss status, then detailed understanding of each sales floor is achieved, but operational efficiency significantly reduces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderstanding precision of opportunity loss statusVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the store into multiple sales floors and evaluates opportunity loss status for each sales floor independently. The evaluation unit calculates opportunity loss for each sales floor based on customer count and purchase count data, allowing detailed analysis of each segment while aggregating results for overall store assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an evaluation unit as an intermediary that automatically calculates and evaluates opportunity loss status. This intermediary processes raw data (customer counts, purchase counts) and generates evaluated results (opportunity loss status, attention determination), eliminating the need for supervisors to manually check each sales floor while providing precise evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If simple comparison of sales status among chain stores is performed, then ease of operation is improved, but comprehensive understanding of opportunity loss status is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of comparing sales statusVSAvoidcomprehensive understanding of opportunity loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the evaluation parameters from simple sales status comparison to multi-dimensional opportunity loss evaluation. It calculates opportunity loss based on customer count, purchase count, and their relationship, providing comprehensive insights into why sales may be suboptimal rather than just comparing sales figures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds another dimension to the analysis by evaluating not just sales status but also the relationship between customer count and purchase count. This dimensional expansion allows identification of opportunity loss patterns that simple comparison would miss, such as high customer traffic but low purchase conversion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If the supervisor manually evaluates opportunity loss status for each store in a large management system, then detailed assessment is achieved, but the burden increases significantly with large scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment precision of opportunity lossVSAvoidmanagement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service evaluation where the evaluation unit automatically assesses opportunity loss status without supervisor intervention. The unit retrieves data from storage, performs evaluation calculations, and determines attention requirements autonomously, reducing supervisor burden while maintaining assessment precision across large numbers of stores

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical manual evaluation process with an automated information processing system. Instead of supervisors manually checking each store, the evaluation unit automatically processes data using predetermined evaluation criteria, substituting human effort with automated computation while handling large-scale management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10304015B2Facility management support apparatus, facility management support system, and facility management support method
Publication Date: 2019.05.28 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US10304015B2 patent drawing
  • US10304015B2 patent drawing
  • US10304015B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The number of entering customers and number of paying customers in a store are obtained, statistical information indicating temporal change in status of the number of entering customers and the number of paying customers in a store is generated, the statistical information is displayed along a time axis, the number of a timeslot which is a selection point is displayed on the time axis, and the video of the inside of the store corresponding to the selected timeslot is displayed in response to the user's operation to select the timeslot.