Facility Power Control With Load Shedding for Runtime Extension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power management systems in critical facilities, such as hospitals and data centers, face challenges in maintaining continuous power supply due to grid failures, as they rely on generators with limited fuel capacity and energy storage devices that deplete over time, necessitating efficient runtime extension strategies.

Innovation Solution

A system that calculates and optimizes the runtime of generators and energy storage devices by analyzing load distribution, selectively shedding non-essential loads, and using real-time feedback to maximize operation time during outages, allowing for remote control and prioritization of critical systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the generator operates continuously to supply power during grid failures, then the power supply reliability is improved, but the fuel consumption increases and runtime is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply reliabilityVSAvoidgenerator runtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by calculating estimated runtime before the generator actually operates, using current fuel levels and load conditions to predict how long the generator can sustain power supply, allowing operators to plan and optimize fuel usage in advance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring fuel consumption rates and comparing actual runtime against estimated runtime, then adjusting runtime calculations and alerts based on this feedback to optimize generator operation and extend effective runtime

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Duration of action of moving object

If the energy storage device is used to extend runtime, then the duration of power supply is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply durationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the generator and energy storage device into a coordinated power supply system where the energy storage device extends the effective runtime of the generator, combining two power sources to achieve longer operational duration than either could provide alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system calculates estimated runtime considering both generator fuel capacity and energy storage device capacity before operation begins, allowing operators to understand the extended runtime capability in advance and optimize the configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Duration of action of moving object

If load shedding is performed to extend runtime, then the generator runtime is improved, but the power supply quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenerator runtimeVSAvoidpower supply quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial load shedding by selectively reducing non-critical loads rather than shutting down the entire system, extending generator runtime by operating at reduced capacity while maintaining essential power supply quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different quality levels to different loads by prioritizing critical loads and shedding non-critical loads, ensuring that essential facilities maintain high power supply quality while extending overall runtime through selective load management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If the system monitors and calculates runtime in real-time, then the measurement precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveruntime measurement precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring fuel consumption rates and comparing actual runtime against estimated runtime, then adjusting runtime calculations based on this feedback to maintain high measurement precision without requiring overly complex systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically calculating estimated runtime and comparing it with actual runtime without requiring external intervention, using its own monitoring data to maintain precise runtime measurements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12051903B1System for controlling power in a facility
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US12051903B1 patent drawing
  • US12051903B1 patent drawing
  • US12051903B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling power in a facility having an electrical system including an energy storage device and a generator and an associated fuel tank. The fuel tank provides fuel to the generator and has a gauge indicating remaining fuel. Both the energy storage device and the generator operate. The generator may be used to provide power to the facility, the energy storage device, or both simultaneously. A first power consuming device imposes a first load connected to the electrical system and second power consuming device imposes a second load connected to the electrical system. The system receives information related to the loads and calculates an initial estimated run time of the energy storage device, and information related to the first load and information related to the second load. The system selectively removes the second load in a simulation and calculates a second run time of the energy storage device.