Facility Power Monitoring Control for Peak Demand Spikes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power systems face challenges in efficiently managing peak power demand, leading to high costs and potential system overload, as existing technologies lack effective methods to predict and control transient spikes in power usage, resulting in demand rate charges for facilities.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising sensors and a monitoring and control element that generates performance data, identifies analogous facilities, and sends operational adjustment commands to manage power usage by projecting future demand based on historical data and external factors, thereby controlling power consumption to avoid exceeding predefined thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power systems are sized to handle peak demand, then adequate power generation capacity is provided, but system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadequate power generation capacityVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future power demand using historical data and analog facility performance before the peak demand occurs. This allows proactive operational adjustments to be made in advance, such as pre-cooling facilities or pre-heating water, to reduce the need for oversized peak capacity infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual power consumption and compares it with predicted demand, using this feedback to dynamically adjust facility operations. This closed-loop control enables the system to respond to actual conditions in real-time, optimizing power usage patterns to avoid peak demand charges without requiring oversized infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If demand rates are implemented to encourage customers to avoid peak power usage, then power demand is smoothed, but demand rate charges still occur when thresholds are exceeded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower demand smoothingVSAvoiddemand rate charges
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future power demand using historical data and analog facility performance before the peak demand occurs. This allows proactive operational adjustments to be made in advance, such as pre-cooling facilities or pre-heating water, to reduce the need for oversized peak capacity infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual power consumption and compares it with predicted demand, using this feedback to dynamically adjust facility operations. This closed-loop control enables the system to respond to actual conditions in real-time, optimizing power usage patterns to avoid peak demand charges without requiring oversized infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Use of energy by moving object

If facilities switch to alternative fuel sources during high demand periods, then power consumption is reduced, but operational complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumption reductionVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables facilities to self-regulate their power consumption by automatically adjusting operational parameters based on real-time monitoring and predictive analytics. This self-service approach eliminates the need for manual intervention or complex operational procedures to switch between energy sources, as the system autonomously optimizes power usage patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces mechanical or manual switching between energy sources with an intelligent software-based control system that uses data analytics and automated decision-making. This substitution eliminates the operational complexity of physical fuel source switching while achieving the same goal of reducing peak power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If real-time monitoring and control systems are implemented, then power usage is optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower usage optimizationVSAvoidmonitoring and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring and control system is designed to be universal and multi-functional, serving multiple facilities and purposes through a single integrated platform. By consolidating monitoring, prediction, and control functions into one system that can be applied across diverse facility types, the per-facility complexity is reduced while maintaining comprehensive optimization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses analog facilities as templates or copies to predict and optimize target facility performance. By leveraging data and operational patterns from similar facilities, the system reduces the complexity of building comprehensive monitoring and control systems from scratch for each individual facility, as proven effective patterns can be replicated and adapted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11796986B2System and method for smart system monitoring and control
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 GLOBAL INNOVATION PLATFORM LLC
  • US11796986B2 patent drawing
  • US11796986B2 patent drawing
  • US11796986B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a first facility element having a sensor and configured to generate recent performance data associated with a system of a facility, and a monitoring and control element in communication with the first facility element, where the monitoring and control element is configured to identify one or more analogous facility elements analogous to the first facility element, receive the recent performance data for the first facility element, generate projected performance data for the facility element according to historical performance data associated with the facility element and the one or more analogous facility elements, compare the projected performance data to a performance threshold, and override a setting or operating parameter of the first facility element according to a relationship of the projected performance data to the performance threshold and by sending one or more operational adjustment commands to at least one second facility element.