Facility Resource Allocation With Self-Correcting Prediction Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing resource allocation systems struggle to accurately predict and adapt to operational disruptions, leading to inefficient resource management across a network of facilities.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing a two-tier machine learning model comprising a forecast model and a self-correction model to predict and adjust resource imbalances, incorporating historical data and real-time signals to optimize resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional resource allocation systems are used, then manual control is maintained, but prediction accuracy and adaptability to disruptions deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs self-correction models that automatically adjust predictions based on historical errors and real-time signals without requiring manual intervention. The model continuously learns from its own performance gaps and adapts its predictions, enabling the system to service itself and improve accuracy autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where prediction errors are captured, analyzed, and used to refine future predictions. Historical errors are stored and fed back into the model along with real-time signals, creating a continuous improvement cycle that enhances prediction accuracy while maintaining automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If manual resource reallocation is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but productivity and response time to disruptions worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The resource allocation system automatically detects disruptions, predicts their impact, and executes reallocation decisions without human intervention. The self-correction capability enables the system to autonomously improve its performance over time by learning from historical data and real-time signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary predictions about resource needs and potential disruptions before they actually occur. By forecasting future resource imbalances and preparing allocation strategies in advance, the system can respond more quickly and efficiently when disruptions actually happen, improving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If static resource allocation is used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to operational disruptions worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to disruptionsVSAvoidallocation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static resource allocation to dynamic allocation that continuously adapts to changing conditions. The model incorporates real-time signals and historical data to adjust predictions and allocation decisions dynamically, enabling the system to respond flexibly to operational disruptions while maintaining manageable complexity through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12355675B1Techniques for updating resource predictions and resource allocations
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12355675B1 patent drawing
  • US12355675B1 patent drawing
  • US12355675B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for allocating resources and generating resource allocation instructions are described herein. A model can generate a historical error for resources of a facility based on a first set of predicted resource imbalances and historical data for resources imbalances of the facility for a first set of previous time periods. The model can receive a second predicted resource imbalance for the resources of the facility associated with a first future time period. The model can receive real-time signals for states of the resources of the facility associated with a present time period. The model can generate an adjusted resource prediction for the resources of the facility based at least in part on the historical error, the second predicted resource imbalance, and the real-time resource signals. The adjusted resource prediction can be associated with the first future time period.