Factory Process Prioritization for Demand Response Power Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current demand response (DR) in factories lacks a quantitative evaluation method to determine process prioritization, especially considering production capacity disparities and personnel requirements, making it difficult to accurately assess which processes can be adjusted for power demand management.

Innovation Solution

A process proposal device calculates a demand response priority score using sensor data to evaluate the adjustable power consumption, residence time, and personnel requirements for each process, enabling accurate prioritization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If demand response is performed based only on past production information and process priority, then the evaluation is simple, but the accuracy of determining which process to prioritize is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of process prioritization evaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of residence time, power consumption adjustability, and personnel requirements for each process before demand response execution. This advance preparation enables accurate prioritization when demand response is actually needed, without requiring complex real-time analysis during power supply disruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary evaluation mechanism that calculates a demand response priority score based on multiple parameters (residence time, power adjustability, personnel requirements). This intermediary score serves as a mediator between raw process data and final prioritization decisions, enabling accurate evaluation without direct complex multi-parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the evaluation considers multiple parameters including residence time and personnel requirements, then the evaluation accuracy improves, but the difficulty of determination increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of demand response evaluationVSAvoiddifficulty of process evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms multiple evaluation parameters (residence time, power consumption adjustability, personnel requirements) into a single demand response priority score. This parameter transformation simplifies the evaluation process while maintaining accuracy, as the score aggregates all relevant factors into one comparable metric for each process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual or complex mechanical evaluation processes with automated computational calculations. The processor automatically calculates residence time from sensor data and production plans, computes power adjustability from process information, and determines the final priority score, eliminating the need for manual assessment of multiple parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If processes with long residence time are selected for demand response, then power adjustment is easier, but production impact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of power consumption adjustmentVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically evaluates each process's residence time and adjusts the demand response priority score accordingly. Processes with shorter residence times receive higher priority scores when other conditions are equal, enabling the system to dynamically select processes that minimize production impact while still achieving power adjustment goals. This dynamic scoring adapts to changing production conditions and process characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260029830A1Process proposal device, process proposal method, and process proposal program
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 HITACHI LTD
  • US20260029830A1 patent drawing
  • US20260029830A1 patent drawing
  • US20260029830A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process proposal device includes: a processor; and a storage unit, wherein the storage unit holds evaluation information that associates, with a DR (Demand-Response) priority score, each of an adjustable amount of power consumption for production of a product in a factory, a residence time of the product, and personnel required for production of the product, and the processor: acquires process information indicating a plurality of processes for producing the product, a past production plan, and sensor data acquired in response to the past production plan; calculates, on the basis of the process information and the past production plan, an adjustable amount of the power consumption in each of the processes included in the process information; and calculates the residence time in each of the processes on the basis of the past production plan and the sensor data.