Factory Interface Robot Layout With Integrated Load Locks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electronic device manufacturing systems have inefficiencies due to large operational footprints caused by the configuration of load locks and factory interfaces, leading to wasted space and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

Integrating load locks into the factory interface and using compact factory interface robots with vertical towers and link mechanisms to reduce the overall footprint, allowing for efficient substrate transfer and auxiliary component integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If load locks are positioned between the transfer chamber and the factory interface, then substrate transfer functionality is achieved, but the operational footprint becomes large with long width and length

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate transfer functionalityVSAvoidoperational footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the load lock within the factory interface footprint space, merging two previously separate components (load lock and factory interface) into a single integrated structure. This eliminates the need for separate positioning of load locks between the transfer chamber and factory interface, thereby reducing the overall operational footprint while maintaining substrate transfer functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent reconfigures the spatial arrangement by utilizing vertical space and three-dimensional positioning within the factory interface. Instead of extending the load lock horizontally between chambers, the system positions the load lock within the vertical and lateral dimensions of the factory interface, reducing the horizontal footprint while maintaining functional connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If load locks are integrated into the factory interface footprint space, then footprint efficiency is improved, but the factory interface must accommodate additional components within limited space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefootprint efficiencyVSAvoidcomponent integration density
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The factory interface is divided into distinct functional zones, with the load lock positioned in a specific region within the factory interface footprint. This segmentation allows for organized arrangement of components, reducing spatial conflicts and managing complexity through structured zoning of different functional elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The load lock is nested within the factory interface structure, with the load lock chamber positioned inside or adjacent to the factory interface volume. This nesting arrangement allows the load lock to utilize space within the existing factory interface envelope, maximizing footprint efficiency while containing component density within a defined structural boundary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS12142508B2Factory interface robots usable with integrated load locks
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US12142508B2 patent drawing
  • US12142508B2 patent drawing
  • US12142508B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A factory interface for an electronic device manufacturing system can include a load lock disposed within the interior volume of a factory interface and a factory interface robot disposed within the interior volume of the factory interface. The factory interface robot can be configured to transfer substrates between a first set of substrate carriers and the first load lock. The factory interface robot can comprise a vertical tower, a plurality of links, and an end effector.