Facultative Underwriting System for Reinsurance Decision Speed

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Facultative reinsurance processes are inefficient due to the need for reinsurers to review extensive case files, leading to prolonged decision-making times and increased resource utilization, with no existing system for submitting summarized case information to multiple reinsurers.

Innovation Solution

A network-based facultative underwriting case summary submission system that allows ceding companies to submit summarized information electronically or via voice message, enabling multiple reinsurers to render decisions based on salient criteria without reviewing complete case documents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the complete case file is reviewed by the reinsurer, then the facultative decision is accurate and reliable, but the decision-making time is prolonged (taking two, three or more days)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of facultative decisionVSAvoiddecision-making time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential case summary information from the complete case file, identifying and transmitting only the critical data elements needed for facultative reinsurance decisions. This extraction approach allows reinsurers to make accurate decisions without reviewing the entire case file, thereby reducing decision-making time from days to hours while maintaining decision reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the complete case file into distinct components, separating the essential summary information that reinsurers need for decision-making from the supplementary documentation. This segmentation enables efficient processing by focusing only on the relevant segments (case summary) while excluding unnecessary portions of the complete file.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the complete case file is reviewed by the reinsurer, then the facultative decision is comprehensive, but the staff resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of facultative decisionVSAvoidstaff resources for file review
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential case summary information from the complete case file, identifying and transmitting only the critical data elements needed for facultative reinsurance decisions. This extraction approach allows reinsurers to make accurate decisions without reviewing the entire case file, thereby reducing decision-making time from days to hours while maintaining decision reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If case summary information is submitted to a single reinsurer, then the decision-making process is simplified, but the system lacks versatility for multiple reinsurers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of submission processVSAvoidaccess to multiple reinsurers
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal case summary submission system that can serve multiple reinsurers simultaneously. The standardized case summary format and electronic submission platform are designed to be universally applicable across different reinsurers, allowing a single submission to be distributed to and processed by multiple reinsurers without requiring separate submission processes for each.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10121193B2Facultative underwriting system and method
Publication Date: 2018.11.06 SWISS REINSURANCE CO LTD
  • US10121193B2 patent drawing
  • US10121193B2 patent drawing
  • US10121193B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for processing a life insurance facultative case summary submission over a network between a ceding company and a reinsurer. Initially, a facultative case summary submission is received by the reinsurer from the ceding company via the network. Thereafter, a facultative decision is rendered by the reinsurer based on the received facultative case summary submission. Because the information is summarized and sent electronically or via voice message, less information is processed in a faster period of time thereby rendering quicker decisions than when the complete case history is submitted to the reinsurer for review.