Fail-Safe Link With Parallel Solid State Switches

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current solid state power controllers (SSPCs) lack effective failsafe protection mechanisms, particularly for shorted Field Effect Transistors (FETs), which can lead to wire integration issues and safety threats, and rely on physical fusing devices that limit programmability and wire weight savings.

Innovation Solution

A fail-safe link design utilizing multiple branches of solid state switches with varying periphery sizes in parallel and series configurations, combined with a built-in test circuit that senses overvoltage conditions and controls the switches to prevent short circuits, allowing the circuit to function even with a shorted FET and reporting failures for maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If physical fusing devices are used for failsafe protection, then wire separation relief is achieved, but wire integration flexibility is limited and wire weight savings are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailsafe protectionVSAvoidwire integration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical fusing devices (mechanical/thermal protection) with solid state switches and control circuitry (electronic protection). The solid state power controller uses electronic switching elements and control logic to provide failsafe protection, eliminating the need for physical fuses and thereby enabling flexible wire integration and connector selection without thermal rating constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If solid state switches are used without backup protection, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability on fault conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection circuitryVSAvoidfault tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a control circuit that continuously monitors the state of solid state switches and provides feedback control. The controller detects fault conditions (such as shorted FETs) and responds by activating backup protection mechanisms or isolating failed components. This feedback-based approach enables the system to maintain reliability without requiring complex permanent backup structures, as protection is activated only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If single-thermal-rating fuses are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but programmability and variable thermal management are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidprogrammability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces static, fixed-thermal-rating fuses with dynamic solid state switches that can be programmably configured. The solid state power controller allows variable thermal management by adjusting switching parameters, current limits, and protection thresholds through software programming. This dynamic approach maintains manufacturing simplicity while enabling adaptability, as the same hardware platform can be programmed for different thermal ratings and protection schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3739349B1Fault tolerant fail-safe link comprising parallel branches
Publication Date: 2023.08.16 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3739349B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3739349B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3739349B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to a fail-safe link with a branch comprising a plurality of solid state switches of varying periphery sizes connected in series between a power source and a load. A built-in test circuit senses an overvoltage condition across one or more of the switches of varying periphery sizes and opens or closes the one or more of the switches of varying periphery sizes in accordance with a measured voltage across at least one solid state switch of the plurality of solid state switches. In an arrangement comprising a plurality of branches, the test circuit is connected with the supply side switches and the load switches of the plurality of branches and provides an indication whether a failure has occurred in the supply side switches or the load side switches.