Fail-Safe Mode for Implantable Medical Device Remote Programming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Remote programming of implantable medical devices can result in improper operation due to programming session failures, data corruption, or other adverse events, potentially leading to unnecessary or inappropriate therapies for patients.

Innovation Solution

A fail-safe mode is implemented to prevent improper operation by notifying personnel of session failures, modifying programming parameters to revert to default settings, and delivering therapies to ensure patient safety, including the use of notification devices and processors within the medical device system to invoke fail-safe operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If remote programming session is initiated to modify therapy parameters, then patient care flexibility is improved, but risk of improper operation due to programming failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient care flexibilityVSAvoidproper operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by creating a reversible copy of programming parameters before making changes. The local programmer stores original parameters and can restore them if the remote programming session fails, preventing improper operation while allowing flexible remote modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the local programmer monitors the remote programming session and detects failures. When a failure is detected, the system automatically triggers parameter restoration to maintain proper device operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If programming parameters are modified remotely, then ease of operation is improved, but risk of data corruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote programming capabilityVSAvoiddata corruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a copy of the original programming parameters before remote modification. The local programmer stores this backup copy and uses it to restore parameters if data corruption occurs during remote programming, ensuring data integrity while enabling easy remote operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares protective measures in advance by storing backup parameters before remote programming begins. This cushioning mechanism ensures that if data corruption occurs, the original parameters can be restored, preventing loss of critical information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If fail-safe operations are implemented to prevent improper operation, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproper operationVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The local programmer serves as an intermediary between the remote programmer and the implantable medical device. It handles the complex fail-safe operations including parameter backup, failure detection, and restoration, thereby protecting the simple IMD structure while ensuring reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service fail-safe mechanisms where the local programmer automatically detects programming failures and restores parameters without requiring external intervention. This automation maintains reliability while minimizing the need for complex manual procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9713724B2Fail-safe programming for implantable medical device
Publication Date: 2017.07.25 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US9713724B2 patent drawing
  • US9713724B2 patent drawing
  • US9713724B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In general, the invention is directed to a system with a fail-safe mode for remote programming of medical devices, such as implantable medical devices (IMDs). During a remote programming session, an adverse event, such as a programming session failure, may prevent proper completion of a programming or result in improper programming due to data corruption or other factors. If a programming session is not completed correctly, the IMD is susceptible to improper operation, possibly exposing a patient to delivery of unnecessary or inappropriate therapies. A fail-safe mode reduces the likelihood of improper operation following a programming session failure. The fail-safe mode defines one or more fail-safe operations designed to preserve proper operation of the IMD. In some embodiments, the fail-safe operations include notifying a person concerning the failure of the programming session, modifying programming parameters within the implantable medical device, and delivering a therapy to a patient.