Failed Data Decoding Using Side Information Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data decoding technologies face inefficiencies in handling failed data in storage systems, particularly in determining whether to use block-based or variable-length decoding, leading to increased latency and decreased throughput due to inadequate management of side information.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a processor-based system that utilizes side information such as decoding-success scores, remaining unread data portions, and buffering status to dynamically choose between block-based and variable-length decoding for failed data portions, optimizing the decoding process by prioritizing variable-length decoding for data with higher success scores and block-based decoding for data with lower scores or when the entire block needs to be read.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If block-based decoding is used for all failed data portions, then decoding reliability is improved, but decoding latency increases and throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding reliabilityVSAvoiddecoding latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects between block-based decoding and variable-length decoding based on real-time side information about the failed data portion. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to use variable-length decoding for cases with lower error rates (reducing latency) while resorting to block-based decoding when higher reliability is needed, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the decoding parameter (decoding method) based on the characteristics of the failed data portion. By evaluating side information such as error patterns and data importance, the system adjusts the decoding approach to match the specific situation, achieving both high reliability when needed and low latency when possible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If block-based decoding is used for all failed data portions, then error correction capability is improved, but processing throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoiddecoding throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the decoding method based on the specific characteristics of each failed data portion. By using side information to determine when variable-length decoding is sufficient, the system maintains high error correction capability for difficult cases while achieving higher throughput by avoiding block-based decoding when it is not necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of always applying the full block-based decoding process, the system applies variable-length decoding as a partial solution for cases where it is sufficient. This partial action approach maintains adequate error correction for many cases while significantly improving throughput by avoiding the overhead of full block-based decoding when not needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Speed

If variable-length decoding is used preferentially, then decoding speed is improved, but decoding reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding speedVSAvoiddecoding reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the decoding parameter based on the evaluated characteristics of the failed data portion. By using side information to assess error rates and data characteristics, the system selects variable-length decoding for high-speed cases with lower reliability requirements and block-based decoding for cases requiring higher reliability, thus balancing speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the decoding method based on real-time conditions. When side information indicates that the data portion is suitable for variable-length decoding (lower error rates, less critical data), the system uses this faster method. When reliability requirements are higher or error patterns suggest variable-length decoding may fail, the system dynamically switches to block-based decoding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8910026B2Data decoding using side information
Publication Date: 2014.12.09 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US8910026B2 patent drawing
  • US8910026B2 patent drawing
  • US8910026B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices and/or methods may decode failed data, e.g., utilizing side information related to the failed data to determine how to decode the failed data. The side information may include, e.g., a decoding-success score representing an estimated amount of errors within a failed data portion, a remaining amount of unread portions of a data block including failed data, an amount of requested portions of a data block including failed data, if the failed data is buffered, and a decoding status of any previously-failed data.