Fail-Safe Hinge Pin Assembly for Tool-Less Tight Installation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hinged assemblies in aircraft propulsion systems lack a fail-safe mechanism to prevent structural failure and require large tools for installation, leading to potential loosening and restricted accessibility.

Innovation Solution

A hinged assembly with a fail-safe hinge pin design featuring an inner pin loosely fitted within an outer pin, secured by collars and fasteners that allow for tool-less installation and prevent loosening, while providing a backup in case of outer pin failure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a traditional hinge pin design is used, then the structure is simple, but it lacks fail-safe mechanism and may loosen during operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefail-safe mechanismVSAvoidhinge pin structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge pin is divided into two separate pins (first hinge pin and second hinge pin) that work together. Each pin is secured by its own collar and fastener assembly, creating independent fail-safe mechanisms. If one pin fails, the other remains functional, providing redundancy and preventing complete hinge failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The collars are positioned on the outer surface of the hinge pins, with fasteners projecting through the collars to secure the pins. This nested arrangement allows multiple components (pin, collar, fastener) to work together in a compact configuration that provides both security and fail-safe functionality without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of manufacture

If large tools are used for installation, then the fastening is secure, but accessibility is restricted and installation is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidaccessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The collar and fastener assembly is designed to be self-contained and self-securing. The fastener projects through the collar and engages with the hinge pin in a way that automatically maintains tightness and prevents loosening during operation, eliminating the need for continuous tool intervention or large installation tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using large tools to continuously tighten and secure the hinge pin during operation, the design inverts the approach by using a pre-installed collar and fastener assembly that maintains security passively. The fastener geometry is designed to prevent loosening through operational vibrations and movements without requiring active tool intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the hinge pin is secured tightly, then the assembly remains tight, but it requires anti-rotation features that complicate the design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly tightnessVSAvoidanti-rotation features
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The collar is designed with an asymmetric geometry relative to the hinge pin, with the fastener projecting through specific positions on the collar. This asymmetric arrangement creates inherent resistance to rotation and loosening forces without requiring additional anti-rotation features, as the fastener-collarpin geometry itself prevents rotational movement that would cause loosening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Reliability

If a single hinge pin is used, then the structure is simple, but it lacks backup in case of failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackup mechanismVSAvoidnumber of pins
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hinge connection is segmented into two independent hinge pins rather than using a single pin. Each pin has its own collar and fastener assembly, creating redundant load paths. If one pin fails due to fatigue, corrosion, or other degradation, the second pin continues to provide structural support, preventing catastrophic hinge failure and allowing for safe operation or controlled shutdown.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3896299B1Hinged assembly with fail-safe hinge pin
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 ROHR INC
  • EP3896299B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3896299B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3896299B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A pin assembly is provided with an axial centerline (18). This pin assembly includes an outer pin (38), an inner pin (40), a first collar (42A) and a second collar (42B). The outer pin extends axially along the axial centerline between an outer pin first end (48) and an outer pin second end (50). The inner pin extends axially along the axial centerline within a bore (52) of the outer pin. The first collar circumscribes the outer pin. The first collar is connected to the outer pin and the inner pin at the outer pin first end. The second collar circumscribes the outer pin. The second collar is connected to the outer pin and the inner pin at the outer pin second end.