Fail-Safe Shaft Positioning for Electromechanical Actuators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electromechanical actuator systems in aircraft designs lack fault-tolerance, leading to instability and potential failure in the event of power or mechanical failures, as they do not have hydraulic fluid for damping, necessitating alternative fail-safe systems to maintain control surface stability.

Innovation Solution

A secondary fail-safe shaft positioning system using electromagnetic and mechanical spring forces to automatically return and lock electromechanical actuators to a predetermined position in case of power or mechanical failures, ensuring stability and accuracy of flight control surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If electromechanical actuators are used to replace hydraulic actuators, then device complexity and weight are reduced, but fault-tolerance and stability during failures are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator system complexityVSAvoidfault-tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by incorporating a secondary positioning system that is pre-configured to activate when the primary electromechanical actuator fails. This secondary system includes springs and positioning members that are ready to engage and maintain control surface stability without requiring active intervention after failure occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by transitioning the control surface from active electromechanical control to passive spring-based positioning upon failure. The system changes its operational state from powered to unpowered, allowing the spring force to become the dominant parameter for maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Weight of stationary object

If electromechanical actuators are used, then plumbing and weight are reduced, but damping capability and stability after failure are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator system weightVSAvoidcontrol surface stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning system is pre-configured with springs that provide immediate stabilizing force upon actuator failure, cushioning the transition to a failed state and maintaining control surface stability without requiring heavy hydraulic damping systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If a secondary fail-safe system is added to electromechanical actuators, then fault-tolerance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault-toleranceVSAvoidactuator system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the fail-safe function into a separate, independent secondary positioning system that operates independently from the primary electromechanical actuator. This separation allows the fail-safe system to be added without fundamentally redesigning the primary system, thereby limiting the increase in overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The secondary positioning system serves multiple functions: it provides fail-safe positioning, maintains control surface stability, and can potentially assist in normal operation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated components, thereby limiting complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively stabilizes flight control surfaces by securing them in a predetermined position during failures, reducing the risk of instability and enabling continued aircraft functionality, and can be reset automatically once the failure is resolved.

Implementation Method 1

A secondary fail-safe shaft positioning system using electromagnetic and mechanical spring forces to automatically return and lock electromechanical actuators to a predetermined position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical spring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

A secondary fail-safe shaft positioning system using electromagnetic and mechanical spring forces to automatically return and lock electromechanical actuators to a predetermined position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Electromagnet

Data Source

PatentEP3127127B1Mechanism, apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2024.04.10 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3127127B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3127127B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3127127B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

Provided is a shaft positioning system for an electromechanical actuator. According to various examples, the positioning system includes a shaft coupled to an electromechanical actuator. The shaft moves along a linear axis and the electromechanical actuator is free to translate during normal operation. An electromagnetic coil positioned around at least a portion of the shaft. The electromagnetic coil produces a magnetic field when electrical current is applied. A metal housing surrounds at least a portion of the electromagnetic coil. The shaft is placed in a predetermined position when the metal housing is in contact with a first magnet and translational motion of the electromechanical actuator is restricted when the shaft is placed in the predetermined position.