Failure Mode Relative Likelihood Algorithm for Fault Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ambiguity in determining the root cause of failures in monitored systems due to overlapping evidence, leading to uncertainty in fault reasoning, often requiring complex and expensive software to distinguish between contributing system components.

Innovation Solution

The failure-mode-relative-likelihood algorithm computes the relative probability of failure modes based on evidence observations, using a reference model of the system that incorporates a Noisy-OR model and naïve Bayesian reasoning, accounting for false alarms and unknown factors, to determine the likelihood of failure modes in a monitored system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complex software is used to determine root cause failures, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault diagnosis accuracyVSAvoidsoftware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex, expensive software with a simple probabilistic algorithm that uses basic mathematical operations (multiplication, addition, division) to compute failure likelihoods. The solution uses inexpensive monitor data and straightforward probability calculations instead of sophisticated diagnostic software.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the fault diagnosis problem from a complex logical analysis into a probabilistic parameter calculation. By changing the approach from qualitative fault tree analysis to quantitative probability computation using likelihood ratios, the system achieves accurate root cause identification with simpler methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If complex software is used to determine root cause failures, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault diagnosis accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses computationally inexpensive probability calculations that require minimal processing power. The algorithm computes likelihood ratios using basic arithmetic operations on monitor data, avoiding the energy-intensive computations required by complex diagnostic software.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If monitors are connected in many-to-many relationship to failure modes, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidmonitor configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent handles the many-to-many monitor-failure mode relationships by transforming the complexity into probabilistic parameter calculations. Instead of managing complex logical relationships, the system uses likelihood ratios and probability computations to naturally handle multiple monitors indicating multiple failure modes, simplifying the analysis while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8224765B2Method for computing the relative likelihood of failures
Publication Date: 2012.07.17 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US8224765B2 patent drawing
  • US8224765B2 patent drawing
  • US8224765B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining relative likelihood of a failure mode is provided. The method comprises receiving evidence observations of a monitored system from monitors connected in a many-to-many relationship to the failure modes, generating a fault condition including states of all failure modes that are connected to the monitors, and computing a relative probability of failure for each failure mode. The fault condition is generated for a reference model of the monitored system and is based on the received evidence observations. The relative probability of failure for each failure mode is based on a false alarm probability, a detection probability, and a ratio of prior probabilities of a candidate hypothesis to a null hypothesis of no active failure mode.