Fair Value Pricing System for Equity Research Transparency
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Bundled and soft commission arrangements in the financial industry lack transparency, making it difficult for institutional investors to determine the true cost of equity research, leading to market distortions and potential misallocation of resources.
Innovation Solution
A system and method for determining a range of fair value prices for equity research by comparing the spending habits of a buy-side firm with its peer groups, using various pricing techniques such as average research spend, wallet share, commission allocation, and research expense ratio, to facilitate transparent pricing discussions between sell-side and buy-side firms.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If bundled brokerage arrangements are used to provide trade execution and equity research together, then service integration and convenience are improved, but transparency and cost clarity deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the bundled service into distinct components: trade execution costs and equity research costs. By calculating and presenting these costs separately through the computing device, the system enables fund investors to see the breakdown of total costs, thereby maintaining service integration while improving cost transparency and accountability.
2Quantity of substance
If soft commission arrangements are used to pay for third-party research, then research funding is improved, but market distortion and incentive misalignment worsen
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the computing device calculates and presents to the fund manager the specific amount of soft commission dollars allocated to equity research versus trade execution. This feedback enables the fund manager to make informed decisions about directing order flow, aligning incentives with fund investor interests while maintaining adequate research funding through transparent allocation tracking.
3Measurement precision
If multiple pricing techniques are used to determine fair value prices, then pricing accuracy and fairness are improved, but computational complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges multiple pricing techniques (peer group comparison, percentage of commissions method, and cost-plus method) into a single integrated computing device system. The computing device automatically applies all three techniques, compares their results, and presents a range of fair value prices, thereby achieving high pricing accuracy through multiple methods while managing computational complexity through automated integration.
Data Source
AI summary
Methods for determining a range of fair value prices for equity research to be supplied by a sell-side firm to a buy-side firm. The range of fair value prices may be used, for example, to frame the discussions between the sell-side firm and the buy-side firm over the price of equity research supplied by the sell-side firm. For example, the parties may engage in discussion discussions as to which determined fair value price or prices are most appropriate to the parties' circumstances. A number of different pricing techniques are disclosed.