Rotorcraft Fairing Edge Handhold With Support Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Accessing aircraft components without damaging fairings, which are often constructed from lightweight materials and lack provisions for handholds, poses challenges during maintenance, especially for larger aircraft where personnel need to crawl on the aircraft.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a fairing edge handhold with a support structure that provides a clearance distance between the fairing and rotor flight controls, allowing for hand traffic loads to be supported without damaging the fairing, by adding a second edge portion with a greater clearance distance and a support structure attached below it.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If fairings are constructed from lightweight materials to reduce weight, then weight of the aircraft is reduced, but the fairings become more susceptible to damage from hand traffic loads during maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft weightVSAvoidfairing resistance to hand traffic loads
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The fairing edge is segmented into a first edge portion and a second edge portion, with the second edge portion incorporating a handhold feature. This segmentation allows the fairing to maintain its lightweight construction while providing a specific region designed to withstand hand traffic loads during maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fairing is designed with non-uniform properties along its edge. The second edge portion has enhanced structural characteristics (increased thickness, integrated handhold) specifically at locations where hand traffic loads are expected, while other portions remain lightweight. This local quality enhancement resolves the contradiction by providing strength only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If handholds are added to fairings to enable maintenance access, then ease of operation during maintenance is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance accessVSAvoidfairing structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The handhold feature is merged with the fairing edge structure itself rather than being added as a separate component. The second edge portion of the fairing is formed to directly provide the handhold functionality, integrating the maintenance access feature into the existing fairing geometry and minimizing additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The second edge portion of the fairing serves multiple functions: it maintains the aerodynamic outer mold line, provides structural support, and creates the handhold feature for maintenance access. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components and minimizes overall device complexity while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If clearance distance is increased to provide handhold space, then ease of operation is improved, but the aerodynamic efficiency may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandhold accessibilityVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The fairing design incorporates localized clearance increases only at specific edge portions where handholds are needed, rather than uniformly increasing clearance throughout. This allows maintenance personnel to access handholds while minimizing the overall impact on aerodynamic flow and energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The design provides just enough clearance distance at the second edge portion to accommodate handhold functionality and maintenance access, rather than excessively increasing clearance throughout the entire fairing structure. This partial action approach balances ease of operation with aerodynamic efficiency by making minimal necessary modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10882602B2Fairing edge handhold
Publication Date: 2021.01.05 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US10882602B2 patent drawing
  • US10882602B2 patent drawing
  • US10882602B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fairing is provided in one example embodiment and may include a first edge portion to provide a first clearance distance between the fairing and rotor flight controls of a rotorcraft; a second edge portion to provide a second clearance distance between the fairing and the rotor flight controls of the aircraft, wherein the second clearance distance is greater than the first clearance distance; and a support structure attached to the fairing below the second edge portion. A rotorcraft is provided in another example embodiment and may include a fairing in which the fairing can include a handhold portion along an edge of the fairing. The handhold portion can include a handhold clearance distance between the handhold portion and rotor flight controls of the rotorcraft; and a support structure attached to the fairing below the handhold portion.