Fake Signature Detection Using Inter and Intra-Model Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In remote and electronic transactions, fraudsters exploit image manipulation software to create fake signatures, making it difficult for systems to distinguish between genuine and fraudulent signatures, thereby increasing the risk of successful fraudulent attempts.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for identifying and analyzing signatures using fake signature detection models, including inter-signature and intra-signature detection models, to determine if a signature is fake by identifying commonalities and anomalous consistencies, and taking appropriate actions such as rejecting requests or subjecting them to additional authentication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If image manipulation software is used to create fake signatures, then the ability to forge signatures improves, but the difficulty of detecting fake signatures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of creating fake signaturesVSAvoiddifficulty of detecting fake signatures
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is divided into multiple specialized models: inter-signature detection models that compare signatures across different documents, intra-signature detection models that analyze consistency within a single signature, and font detection models that identify computer-generated text. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in detecting specific types of anomalies, thereby improving overall detection capability against sophisticated forgeries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system moves beyond traditional single-document signature verification by adding the dimension of cross-document analysis. By comparing signatures across multiple documents (inter-signature detection) and analyzing consistency within the signature itself (intra-signature detection), the system creates multiple detection dimensions that make it harder for fraudsters to evade detection through simple image manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If multiple fake signature detection models are applied to analyze signatures, then the accuracy of fake signature detection improves, but the complexity of the detection system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of fake signature detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of detection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex detection task is segmented into multiple specialized models: inter-signature detection models for comparing signatures across documents, intra-signature detection models for analyzing internal consistency, and font detection models for identifying computer-generated text. Each model focuses on specific detection aspects, improving accuracy while managing complexity through functional specialization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system employs universal models that can handle multiple detection functions. The inter-signature detection model, for example, serves both to detect forgery and to establish baseline signature characteristics. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by avoiding redundant specialized models for each detection function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240112486A1Fake Signature Detection
Publication Date: 2024.04.04 JUMIO CORP
  • US20240112486A1 patent drawing
  • US20240112486A1 patent drawing
  • US20240112486A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure includes a system and method for fake signature detection including identifying, using one or more processors, within a document image a signature portion, the signature portion representing a signature; applying, using the one or more processors, one or more fake signature detection models to the signature portion; determining, using the one or more processors and the one or more fake signature detection models, whether the signature represented in the signature portion is a fake signature; and presenting, using the one or more processors, the determination.