Settable Fall Arrest Reel With Traveller-Triggered Line Limit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fall arrest devices do not effectively prevent users from falling and require additional locking mechanisms, increasing complexity and cost.

Innovation Solution

A fall arrest device with a traveller mechanism that activates the speed responsive engagement assembly when a predetermined length of safety line is paid out, eliminating the need for a separate locking mechanism and allowing for adjustable setting of the maximum length of safety line.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an additional locking mechanism is incorporated into the fall arrest device to prevent falls, then fall prevention capability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall prevention capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the fall prevention function with the existing drum rotation control mechanism. The traveller mechanism integrates with the drum and speed responsive engagement assembly, using the drum's rotation to both pay out/retract the safety line and to trigger fall prevention when the traveller reaches the engagement assembly. This merging eliminates the need for a separate locking mechanism while maintaining fall prevention capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The drum serves multiple functions: it winds and pays out the safety line during normal operation, and it simultaneously acts as the trigger mechanism for fall prevention when the traveller reaches the engagement assembly. The speed responsive engagement assembly also serves dual purposes by controlling both normal drum rotation and preventing overspeed rotation during falls. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a separate locking mechanism is added to prevent falls, then safety is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The fall prevention function is merged with existing components rather than adding a separate locking mechanism. The traveller, drum, and speed responsive engagement assembly work together to provide both safety line control and fall prevention, eliminating the need for additional expensive components while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the maximum length of safety line is restricted to prevent falls, then fall likelihood is reduced, but user movement freedom is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall preventionVSAvoiduser movement freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts between two states: during normal operation, the traveller moves freely along the drum allowing the user to move within the safety line length limit; when the traveller reaches the engagement assembly, the system automatically transitions to a locked state to prevent falls. This dynamic behavior provides both user freedom and safety without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If the traveller is made load-bearing to ensure safety during fall arrest, then reliability is improved, but device weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during fall arrestVSAvoidtraveller weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The traveller acts as an intermediary or actuator that triggers the fall arrest function without bearing the full load. When the traveller reaches the engagement assembly, it activates the speed responsive engagement assembly to lock the drum, transferring the load-bearing responsibility to the existing engagement assembly and drum structure rather than requiring the traveller itself to be load-bearing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device reduces complexity and cost by integrating a traveller that activates the engagement assembly without additional load-bearing components, enhancing safety and reliability by preventing falls and adjusting the safety line length to restrict users from hazardous edges.

Implementation Method 1

a traveller configured to move in response to rotation of the drum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a speed responsive engagement assembly arranged to inhibit rotation of the drum above a predetermined rotational speed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 3

a drum configured to have a safety line wound thereon

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP4058155B1Settable length fall arrest device
Publication Date: 2026.02.25 MSA TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • EP4058155B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4058155B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4058155B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~4

AI summary

A fall arrest device (10) includes a drum (1) configured to have a safety line (2) wound thereon, a speed responsive engagement assembly (3, 4, 6) arranged to inhibit rotation of the drum (1) above a predetermined rotational speed, and a traveller (30) configured to move in response to rotation of the drum (1). The traveller (30) is configured to activate the speed responsive engagement assembly (3, 4, 6) when a predetermined length of safety line has been paid out. This allows a user to be restrained from the edge of a worksite or other location where a fall may occur.