Surveillance System for Fall Detection Using Motion Feature Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current patient fall detection systems in healthcare facilities are prone to false alarms, which burden staff with unnecessary interventions, due to their inability to accurately differentiate between patient activity and actual fall risks, especially in environments with varying lighting conditions.

Innovation Solution

A surveillance system that employs supervised learning techniques to analyze video frames, extracting motion feature patterns from real and false alarm cases, using a classifier to determine statistically significant similarities and confirm fall alerts, thereby improving accuracy and reducing false positives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional fall detection systems are used to monitor patient safety, then patient safety monitoring is provided, but false alarms increase burdening staff with unnecessary interventions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall detection accuracyVSAvoidfalse alarms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fall detection task into multiple independent analysis components: motion feature extraction, pattern matching against stored motion templates, and classifier verification. Each component processes specific aspects of the video data independently, allowing the system to cross-validate findings and reduce false alarms while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces motion feature patterns as an intermediary layer between raw video data and fall detection decisions. These pre-stored motion templates serve as reference standards that mediate the comparison process, enabling the system to objectively evaluate whether observed motions represent actual falls or normal patient activities, thereby reducing false alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If motion detection sensitivity is increased to detect all potential falls, then detection coverage improves, but false alarm rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall detection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback through a verification mechanism where detected fall events are cross-checked against stored motion feature patterns before final confirmation. This feedback loop allows the system to adjust its detection threshold dynamically - confirming true falls while filtering out false positives - thereby maintaining high sensitivity without proportionally increasing false alarm rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial verification by comparing only critical motion features against stored patterns rather than analyzing every aspect of the video data in full detail. This selective approach allows the system to maintain high detection sensitivity for critical fall indicators while using simplified comparison logic that reduces false alarms from minor motion variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Speed

If video analysis is performed in real-time to detect falls immediately, then response time improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall detection response timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing and storing motion feature patterns from historical data before real-time detection begins. These pre-computed motion templates capture characteristic fall patterns that can be quickly matched against incoming video data during real-time operation, enabling fast detection without performing complex analysis on every frame during the actual monitoring phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12106654B2Surveillance system and method for predicting patient falls using motion feature patterns
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 CAREVIEW COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • US12106654B2 patent drawing
  • US12106654B2 patent drawing
  • US12106654B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for detecting a fall risk condition, the system comprising a surveillance camera configured to generate a plurality of frames showing an area in which a patient at risk of falling is being monitored, and a computer system comprising memory and logic circuitry configured to store motion feature patterns that are extracted from video recordings, the motion feature patterns are representative of motion associated with real alarm cases and false-alarm cases of fall events, receive a fall alert from a classifier, determine motion features of one or more frames from the plurality of frames that correspond to the fall alert; compare the motion features of the one or more frames with the motion feature patterns, and determine whether to confirm the fall alert based on the comparison.