Patient Fall Detection Using Multi-Sensor Orientation Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fall detection and prevention systems for elderly hospital patients are inadequate due to lack of sensitivity, high false alarm rates, and limited effectiveness, with methods like side bed rails being restrictive, accelerometers being unreliable, and video surveillance being complex and costly.

Innovation Solution

A system using multiple sensors, including accelerometers and tilt sensors, to monitor the orientation of a patient's body parts relative to gravitational force, combined with pressure pads and RTLS technology, to infer the patient's status and provide alerts for unsafe positions, thereby reducing false alarms and improving detection accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If accelerometers are used to detect falls, then fall detection capability is provided, but false alarm rate increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall detection reliabilityVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensors (accelerometers, tilt sensors, pressure pads, RTLS) into an integrated monitoring system. The accelerometers detect motion and impact, tilt sensors monitor body orientation, pressure pads detect presence and position, and RTLS provides location data. By merging these diverse sensing modalities, the system achieves reliable fall detection while minimizing false alarms through cross-validation of multiple independent measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a central monitoring system that acts as an intermediary between the distributed sensors and the fall detection logic. This central system receives data from multiple sensors, processes the information collectively, and determines falls based on correlated evidence from different sensing modalities rather than relying on a single sensor type, thereby reducing false alarms while maintaining high detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If side bed rails are used to prevent falls, then fall prevention is achieved, but patient comfort deteriorates and ease of operation worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall prevention effectivenessVSAvoidpatient freedom of movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical fall prevention system (side bed rails) with an electronic sensing and monitoring system. Instead of physically constraining patients with rails, the system uses accelerometers, tilt sensors, pressure pads, and RTLS to detect falls and monitor patient position. This substitution eliminates the need for restrictive mechanical barriers while maintaining fall prevention effectiveness through active detection and alerting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system enables patients to move freely without physical restraints while the system autonomously monitors their position and detects falls. The sensors continuously track patient status and the central system automatically processes data and generates alerts when falls are detected, providing fall prevention through intelligent monitoring rather than mechanical constraint, thereby preserving patient independence and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If video surveillance is used to detect falls, then detection capability is provided, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential fall detection function from complex video surveillance systems and implements it through simpler, dedicated sensors. Instead of using sophisticated image processing algorithms to analyze video feeds, the system employs accelerometers to detect impact forces, tilt sensors to monitor orientation changes, pressure pads to detect position changes, and RTLS to track location. This extraction of core detection functionality achieves comparable or superior accuracy with significantly reduced system complexity and lower cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively detects falls and prevents unsafe positions with reduced false alarms, providing a more reliable and comprehensive monitoring solution for hospital patients, enhancing patient safety without the restrictive nature of existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

A sensor (e.g., an accelerometer or other tilt sensor) coupled to a body part of the patient, and adapted to indicate an orientation of the sensor relative to a direction of gravitational force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

A pressure pad may be located at a known position in a hospital room, and may be used to detect a presence of the patient in the hospital room, and/or to detect a position of the patient in the hospital room

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure:

Data Source

PatentUS8866620B2System and method for fall prevention and detection
Publication Date: 2014.10.21 CENTRAK INC
  • US8866620B2 patent drawing
  • US8866620B2 patent drawing
  • US8866620B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System and method to determine a status of a person, the method including: receiving a sensor indication of a first orientation of a first body part of the person relative to a predetermined direction; receiving a sensor indication of a second orientation of a second body part of the person relative to the predetermined direction; receiving a sensor indication of a location of the person; inferring, by use of a processor, an orientation of the person from the sensor indication of the first orientation and the sensor indication of the second orientation; and determining, by use of a processor, the status of the person from an allowability of the inferred orientation of the person at the indicated location.