Fallback Bandwidth Classes for Flexible Component-Carrier Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cellular communication technologies, as defined by 3GPP standards, restrict carrier aggregation channels to non-overlapping bandwidths, leading to inefficient utilization of allocated bandwidth.

Innovation Solution

Allocating aggregated channel bandwidth classes for a fallback group that overlap in frequency, allowing for more flexible use of component carriers to fully utilize the available bandwidth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If carrier aggregation channels are restricted to non-overlapping bandwidths as per 3GPP standards, then channel organization is simplified and standardized, but bandwidth utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel organization simplicityVSAvoidbandwidth utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the carrier aggregation bandwidth classes into multiple subsets, where each subset contains bandwidth classes with non-overlapping frequency ranges. This allows the system to maintain standardized non-overlapping organization within each subset while enabling overlapping across different subsets, thereby resolving the contradiction between organizational simplicity and utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of organization by creating multiple subsets of bandwidth classes. Instead of a single flat structure, the system now has a hierarchical structure with subsets as the first dimension and bandwidth classes within subsets as the second dimension. This allows overlapping bandwidth classes to be organized in a structured manner that maintains both simplicity and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If aggregated channel bandwidth classes overlap in frequency, then bandwidth utilization efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth utilization efficiencyVSAvoidbandwidth class organization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting bandwidth classes into multiple subsets where each subset maintains non-overlapping frequency ranges, the patent reduces the complexity of managing overlapping bands. The segmentation allows the system to leverage the simplicity of non-overlapping organization within subsets while achieving overall bandwidth efficiency throughè·¨-subset overlapping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the organizational parameter from a single flat structure to a multi-subset hierarchical structure. This parameter change allows the system to maintain manageable complexity within each subset while achieving superior overall bandwidth utilization through the coordinated use of multiple subsets with overlapping frequency ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12432706B2Carrier aggregation bandwidth classes with overlapping bandwidth ranges
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 APPLE INC
  • US12432706B2 patent drawing
  • US12432706B2 patent drawing
  • US12432706B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aggregated channel bandwidth classes that overlap in frequency are allocated for a fallback group. The fallback group may define an increased or maximum bandwidth of aggregated component carriers as allocated by a network. By enabling the aggregated channel bandwidth classes for a fallback group to overlap in frequency, for an available aggregated channel bandwidth, a first aggregated channel bandwidth class may be implemented using a first number of component carriers, and a second aggregated channel bandwidth class may be implemented using a second number of component carriers different from the first. The different number of component carriers may enable more flexibility to more fully utilize the available aggregated channel bandwidth for communication. The network may then allocate one of these aggregated channel bandwidth classes to user equipment that more fully utilizes the available aggregated channel bandwidth for communication.