Multi-Stage Falling Particle Receiver for Stable High-Opacity Heating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing falling particle solar receivers face inefficiencies in capturing solar energy due to low particle volume fraction, opacity, and flow instability, leading to increased transmittance and uneven heating, which results in reduced energy conversion and storage capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage falling particle receiver system that uses flow retarding devices, such as troughs and funnels, to periodically collect and release particles, reducing vertical and horizontal dispersion, enhancing particle flow stability, and maintaining high opacity, while minimizing material usage and protecting surfaces from erosion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If particles fall freely through the receiver, then the particle flow rate increases, but the particle volume fraction and opacity decrease due to gravitational acceleration and dispersion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle flow rateVSAvoidparticle volume fraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The receiver is divided into multiple stages with flow retarding devices at intermediate levels. Each stage processes particles sequentially, allowing the system to handle high flow rates while maintaining adequate particle concentration at each level through staged deceleration and redistribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Flow retarding devices act as intermediary elements between the particle source and final collection. These devices mediate the particle flow by reducing velocity and redistributing particles, preventing excessive dispersion while maintaining high throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Duration of action of moving object

If particles fall freely through the receiver, then the residence time decreases, but the energy capture efficiency worsens due to reduced heating time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidence timeVSAvoidenergy capture efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The heating process is segmented into multiple stages. Particles receive incremental heating at each stage rather than requiring prolonged exposure in a single stage, achieving adequate energy capture with reduced total residence time through distributed heating zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-stage configuration ensures continuous heating action throughout the particle descent. Each stage contributes to the cumulative heating process, maintaining continuous energy transfer without requiring extended residence time at any single location

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Loss of energy

If the particle curtain is exposed to concentrated solar energy, then the energy absorption increases, but the flow stability deteriorates due to perturbation and transformation into a wider, unstable curtain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorptionVSAvoidflow stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The particle curtain is divided into multiple smaller curtains by flow retarding devices at each stage. Each segmented curtain is more stable and easier to control, preventing the transformation into a wide, unstable flow while collectively maintaining high energy absorption across all stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Quantity of substance

If more particles are used to maintain high volume fraction, then the opacity increases, but the material cost and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle volume fractionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple stages with fewer particles at each level rather than requiring a large volume fraction in a single stage. This segmented approach achieves equivalent overall heating performance with reduced total particle inventory and simplified system configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces particle velocity and dispersion, increases heat transfer uniformity, and maintains high opacity, leading to improved energy capture and conversion efficiency while reducing costs and maintenance needs.

Implementation Method 1

The particle receivers utilize solid particles as the heat transfer medium to absorb the incident concentrated solar energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption (EM radiation): Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

gravitational acceleration that increases downward velocity and dispersion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11846451B2Multi-stage falling particle receivers
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US11846451B2 patent drawing
  • US11846451B2 patent drawing
  • US11846451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to multi-stage falling particle receivers and methods of falling particle heating. As the particles fall through the receiver, the particles are periodically collected and released by flow retarding devices. The periodic catch-and-release of the particles falling through the receiver reduces particle flow dispersion, increases particle opacity and solar absorption, and reduces erosion and damage to surfaces caused by direct particle impingement.