Fan Impeller with Resilient Leading Edge

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ventilation fans face noise and efficiency issues due to turbulence caused by grills or plates used for safety, which obstruct airflow and increase noise levels.

Innovation Solution

An impeller design featuring a hub and blades with a resilient material along the leading edge, connected via a resilient hub portion, allowing for bi-injection moulding and eliminating the need for additional protective grills, ensuring safety and smooth airflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a grill or plate is provided between the impeller and the room for safety, then user safety is improved, but noise levels increase and airflow efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The impeller blades have different material properties at different locations: the leading edge is made of soft resilient material for safety, while the rest of the blade maintains rigid material for efficient air movement. This local differentiation allows the fan to operate safely without requiring an external grill, thus avoiding noise and airflow obstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The soft resilient material on the leading edge, which might seem to increase resistance, actually reduces turbulence and noise by smoothly interacting with air flow and preventing violent collisions. The safety feature itself becomes beneficial by reducing harmful turbulence effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Reliability

If a grill or plate is provided for safety, then user safety is improved, but airflow efficiency deteriorates due to turbulence and drag

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidairflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The impeller blades have different material properties at different locations: the leading edge is made of soft resilient material for safety, while the rest of the blade maintains rigid material for efficient air movement. This local differentiation allows the fan to operate safely without requiring an external grill, thus avoiding noise and airflow obstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The soft resilient material on the leading edge, which might seem to increase resistance, actually reduces turbulence and noise by smoothly interacting with air flow and preventing violent collisions. The safety feature itself becomes beneficial by reducing harmful turbulence effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If the impeller is exposed without additional protection, then airflow efficiency is improved, but user safety deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow efficiencyVSAvoidinjury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The impeller blades have different material properties at different locations: the leading edge is made of soft resilient material for safety, while the rest of the blade maintains rigid material for efficient air movement. This local differentiation allows the fan to operate safely without requiring an external grill, thus avoiding noise and airflow obstruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The impeller itself provides the safety function through its soft resilient leading edge, eliminating the need for separate protective devices. The safety feature is integrated into the impeller design, allowing it to protect users while maintaining airflow efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If separate safety components are added to the impeller, then user safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidimpeller structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety function is merged with the impeller blade structure itself. The soft resilient material is integrated into the leading edge of the blades, combining the air-moving function and the safety function into a single component, thus avoiding additional protective devices and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The impeller blade serves multiple functions: it moves air efficiently (rigid material portion) and provides safety protection (soft resilient leading edge). This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate safety components, reducing device complexity while maintaining both performance and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a quieter and more efficient operation by dissipating impact energy and maintaining impeller balance, reducing noise and enhancing airflow efficiency without additional protective barriers.

Implementation Method 1

The resilient material formed on the leading edge of the blades is softer than the rigid material which forms the main body of the impeller (hub and blades). Consequently, in an impact between the leading edge of the blades and another object, the energy is dissipated in the resilient material, reducing the force on the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact energy dissipation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

The impeller can be moulded by bi-injection moulding. Bi-injection moulding provides a particularly good bond between the two materials. The injection point can be placed centrally, over the axis of rotation of the impeller in the centre of the hub. The pressure of inserting the molten resilient material is then symmetrically distributed around the impeller which results in even formation of the resilient material and maintains the balance of the impeller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBi-injection moulding:

Data Source

PatentEP2444674B1Fan impeller
Publication Date: 2019.12.04 GREENWOOD AIR MANAGEMENT
  • EP2444674B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2444674B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2444674B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An impeller for a fan, comprising a hub and a plurality of blades extending from the hub, wherein each blade has a leading edge and a trailing edge and wherein each blade has a first portion made from a rigid material and a second portion formed on the leading edge of the first portion and formed from a resilient material. The impeller increases the safety of the impeller by reducing the potential damage or injury caused by collision with the impeller. Consequently, a fan with such an impeller does not require a protective grill in order to meet safety regulations. The absence of a grill increases the efficiency of the fan and reduces the noise caused by turbulence as air passes through the grill. A method of making the impeller is also provided.