Automated Fantasy Draft Selection with Rule-Based Roster Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fantasy draft systems lack efficient methods for selecting players based on user-defined rules and valuating players, leading to unbalanced teams and suboptimal player selection processes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for selecting players in a fantasy draft that involves receiving user-defined rules specifying characteristics and statistics, and using a processor to select players that satisfy these rules, including features like ranked lists, maximum player limits, and automatic selection based on user-defined criteria, as well as valuating players by determining adjusted values based on base values and user-defined rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated player selection is implemented, then drafting efficiency is improved, but team balance and rule compliance may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrafting efficiencyVSAvoidteam balance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the drafted team composition against user-defined rules and constraints, adjusting subsequent selections to maintain balance. The processor evaluates each draft pick's impact on team composition and modifies future selections to comply with rules regarding position distribution, player characteristics, and roster limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated selection process dynamically adapts its criteria based on the current state of the drafted team. As the draft progresses and team composition changes, the system adjusts its selection priorities to ensure rule compliance while maintaining drafting efficiency, rather than following a static predetermined sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If user-defined rules are enforced, then team composition quality is improved, but selection flexibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveteam composition qualityVSAvoidselection flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The rule system is segmented into multiple independent constraints (position requirements, characteristic thresholds, roster limits) that can be individually configured and adjusted. This allows users to define specific composition requirements without creating an overly rigid overall system, maintaining flexibility in how rules are applied to different selection scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic modification of rule parameters during the draft process. Users can adjust thresholds, limits, and criteria based on draft progression and available player pool, enabling the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining composition quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If real-time manual drafting is required, then user control is improved, but system productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidsystem productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides automated draft execution that operates independently once initial parameters are set. The processor automatically evaluates player options, applies user-defined rules, and makes selections without requiring continuous user intervention, enabling the system to function autonomously while maintaining user-defined control parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Users configure all drafting preferences, rules, and constraints before the draft begins. This preliminary setup includes defining team composition requirements, player characteristics priorities, and roster limitations. Once configured, the system executes the entire draft process automatically without requiring real-time user decisions, significantly improving productivity while preserving user control over the underlying parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8951107B2System and method for non-sequential automated fantasy drafting
Publication Date: 2015.02.10 DISNEY ENTERPRISES INC
  • US8951107B2 patent drawing
  • US8951107B2 patent drawing
  • US8951107B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for non-sequential automated fantasy drafting are disclosed. In one embodiment, a method comprises storing a ranked list of players, each player associated with one or more characteristics from a predefined set of characteristics, defining one or more rules which specify the maximum number of active players having each of the characteristics and a maximum number of players having of each of the characteristics, storing a roster of previously selected players having the maximum number of active players for a particular characteristic and less than the maximum number of players for the particular characteristic, and automatically selecting, in an electronic device, based on the stored roster, a player for the roster from the ranked list of players satisfying the one or more rules such that a player is selected with a lower rank than a player with the particular characteristic.