Semi-Autonomous Farm Robots With Remote Control Handover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural tasks requiring dexterity and delicacy, such as trimming plants, picking weeds, or picking fruit, pose challenges for autonomous robots due to the uniqueness of each plant, making it difficult for them to perform these tasks safely and efficiently without human intervention.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of semi-autonomous robots that delegate tasks to minimize human intervention, using scout robots to gather data and identify target plants, and transitioning to manual control only when necessary to ensure safety, allowing a small number of human operators to manage a large fleet of robots by providing manual control interfaces and predefining robot plans for autonomous execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous robots are used to perform agricultural tasks, then productivity is improved through automation, but reliability deteriorates due to inability to handle delicate tasks safely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation efficiencyVSAvoidtask safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a human operator as an intermediary between the autonomous robot and the plant. The robot autonomously navigates to the target plant and positions itself, but a human operator remotely controls the robot's end effector to perform the delicate agricultural task. This intermediary control mechanism allows the system to benefit from robotic automation while ensuring human judgment protects against damage to unique plants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If full manual control is used for delicate agricultural tasks, then reliability is improved through human judgment, but productivity deteriorates due to requirement for extensive human intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask safetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the agricultural task into two distinct phases: autonomous navigation to the target plant, and manual control for the delicate manipulation. The robot independently completes the navigation phase without human intervention, then transitions to manual control only for the specific task execution phase. This segmentation reduces overall human involvement compared to fully manual operation while maintaining safety during the critical manipulation phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If one-to-one human control is implemented, then reliability is improved through direct supervision, but device complexity increases due to control infrastructure requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal remote control interface that can operate any robot in the fleet. A single control system design serves multiple robots, allowing one human operator to manage multiple machines. This universal approach reduces the complexity that would arise from requiring dedicated control systems for each individual robot, while still maintaining direct human supervision for task execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If extensive human intervention is required for each task, then reliability is improved through human oversight, but loss of time increases due to human operator availability constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask safetyVSAvoidoperator response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transmits real-time visual data from the robot's cameras to the human operator's interface, creating a visual copy of the robot's perspective. This allows the operator to observe and control the robot remotely without physical presence at the plant location. The visual copying mechanism enables timely human intervention and decision-making while the robot is positioned at the target plant, reducing delays that would occur with physical relocation or limited sensor feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11285612B2Coordinating agricultural robots
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 DEERE & CO
  • US11285612B2 patent drawing
  • US11285612B2 patent drawing
  • US11285612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations are described herein for coordinating semi-autonomous robots to perform agricultural tasks on a plurality of plants with minimal human intervention. In various implementations, a plurality of robots may be deployed to perform a respective plurality of agricultural tasks. Each agricultural task may be associated with a respective plant of a plurality of plants, and each plant may have been previously designated as a target for one of the agricultural tasks. It may be determined that a given robot has reached an individual plant associated with the respective agricultural task that was assigned to the given robot. Based at least in part on that determination, a manual control interface may be provided at output component(s) of a computing device in network communication with the given robot. The manual control interface may be operable to manually control the given robot to perform the respective agricultural task.