Automated Farm Security Document Generation in Utility Computing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of generating security documentation for IT compute resources in utility computing environments is costly, time-consuming, and prone to errors due to the need for lengthy interviews with highly paid professionals, and requires frequent updates as network configurations change.

Innovation Solution

An automated method that accesses and combines information from a utility computing environment repository to generate a security document, including criticality types and attributes for each device, creating a comprehensive security plan that reduces human intervention and duplication of effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If security documentation is produced manually by professionals through interviews with system designers, then the security plan can be customized and comprehensive, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity documentation accuracyVSAvoiddocumentation creation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates templates for security documentation that can be automatically populated with system information. These templates serve as reusable copies that can be adapted to different systems without requiring complete manual creation each time, significantly reducing documentation time while maintaining consistency and quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automated generation of security documentation by extracting information directly from system configurations and metadata. This self-service approach eliminates the need for manual interviews with system designers, allowing the system to document itself while professionals only need to review and validate the generated content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If security documentation is created through lengthy interviews with highly paid professionals, then comprehensive security coverage is achieved, but the cost becomes prohibitively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity plan completenessVSAvoiddocumentation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Reusable security documentation templates are created once and then copied and adapted for multiple systems. This eliminates the need for professionals to recreate the same security documentation structures repeatedly, significantly reducing the time and cost associated with hiring highly paid professionals for each documentation project.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system extracts security-relevant information directly from system configurations, metadata, and existing documentation. This self-service capability reduces reliance on expensive human professionals, requiring their involvement only for review and validation rather than complete creation, thereby dramatically reducing documentation costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the network configuration changes frequently, then the system remains adaptable and flexible, but the security documentation becomes outdated quickly requiring constant updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork configuration flexibilityVSAvoiddocumentation validity period
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes continuous monitoring of system configurations and automatically detects changes. When changes are detected, the system triggers updates to the security documentation, ensuring it remains synchronized with the current system state. This feedback loop maintains documentation validity without requiring manual intervention even as configurations change frequently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The security documentation system transitions from a static, manually updated approach to a dynamic, automatically updating system. The documentation is now linked to the live system configuration through metadata and can automatically adapt to changes, allowing the documentation to remain valid indefinitely as long as the system continues to operate and update the documentation automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If manual interviews are conducted to gather security information, then detailed and accurate security data is collected, but the process requires significant coordination and scheduling time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity information accuracyVSAvoiddocumentation generation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically extracts security information from system configurations, metadata, and existing documentation without requiring manual interviews. This self-service approach maintains accuracy by pulling data directly from authoritative system sources while dramatically increasing productivity by eliminating the time-consuming coordination and scheduling of interviews with system designers and stakeholders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7624425B1Method and apparatus for generating a security document for a farm in a utility computing environment
Publication Date: 2009.11.24 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US7624425B1 patent drawing
  • US7624425B1 patent drawing
  • US7624425B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention provide a method and an apparatus for generating a security document for a farm in a utility computing environment. In one method embodiment, the present invention accesses a farm specification in a utility computing environment (UCE) repository. In addition, information related to each device in the farm is accessed. Information criticality types and attributes are then collected for the farm, the information criticality matrix comprising information criticality types and attributes for each the device in the farm. The information criticality types and attributes are then combined with an abstract of a security plan to provide a complete farm security document.