Autonomous Farming Machine Failure Diagnosis and Compensatory Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional farming machines, especially autonomous ones, frequently encounter operational failures due to harsh environmental conditions, leading to performance issues and significant delays in farming operations.

Innovation Solution

The farming machine is equipped with sensors that detect operational failures and configures itself to enter a remedial operational state, where it diagnoses the failure, selects a solution operation, and performs it to resolve the issue, potentially by switching to redundancy or reducing operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous farming machines are deployed to perform farming operations, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to frequent operational failures in harsh conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefarming operation performanceVSAvoidmachine operational reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostics and implements compensatory actions before complete failure occurs. Sensors continuously monitor component health and predict potential failures, allowing the machine to take preventive measures such as adjusting operations or alerting operators before actual breakdowns happen, thus maintaining reliability while preserving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous farming machine performs self-diagnosis and self-compensation for operational failures. When a component fails, the system automatically detects the failure through sensors, determines the impact on farming operations, and implements compensatory actions without human intervention, enabling the machine to service itself and maintain continuous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the farming machine ceases operation to address failures, then reliability is maintained, but productivity deteriorates due to significant delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation correctnessVSAvoidfarming operation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous farming operations even when component failures occur. By implementing compensatory actions such as alternative operational modes, adjusted parameters, or redistributed tasks among remaining functional components, the machine continues to perform useful farming work without complete shutdown, ensuring both reliability and uninterrupted productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The farming machine dynamically adapts its operational mode in response to component failures. The system transitions between different operational states (normal operation, compensatory operation, reduced capability mode) based on real-time component status, allowing flexible adjustment that maintains productivity while ensuring reliable operation within current capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If human operators control farming machines, then reliability is maintained through human judgment, but productivity deteriorates due to time-consuming manual intervention for failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoiddowntime for technician intervention
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously performs failure detection, diagnosis, and compensatory actions without requiring technician intervention. Sensors continuously monitor component status, the control system analyzes failure patterns, and the machine automatically implements appropriate compensatory measures, eliminating the time loss associated with human response and technician deployment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor component performance, the control system analyzes data in real-time, and adjustments are made automatically based on detected anomalies. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables rapid response to failures without human intervention, reducing downtime while maintaining reliable operation through automated decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12265383B2Compensatory actions for automated farming machine failure
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 DEERE & CO
  • US12265383B2 patent drawing
  • US12265383B2 patent drawing
  • US12265383B2 patent drawing

AI summary

As a farming machine travels through a field of plants, the farming machine operates in a normal operational state to perform one or more farming operations. The farming machine detects an operational failure of a component of the farming machine using measurements obtained from one or more sensors coupled to and monitoring the farming machine. The operational failure of the component impacts performance of a first farming operation of the farming operations. The farming machine configures the farming machine to operate in a remedial operational state. In the remedial operational state, the farming machine diagnoses the operational failure of the component using the obtained measurements. In the remedial operational state, the farming machine selects a solution operation to address the operational failure of the component based on the diagnosis. The farming machine performs the determined solution operation.