Farming Machine Priority Control for Quality, Savings, and Productivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing farming machine operations lack the ability to dynamically adjust to user priorities for treatment metrics such as treatment quality, treatment product savings, and farming machine productivity, especially in real-time based on sensor data.

Innovation Solution

A method for operating a farming machine that involves a control system sending user interfaces to a client device to request and receive user priority values for treatment metrics. The system then operates the farming machine according to these priorities, determines actual metric values based on sensor data, and updates operations based on updated user inputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the farming machine operates at high speed to improve productivity, then farming machine productivity increases, but treatment quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefarming machine productivityVSAvoidtreatment quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters including speed based on real-time sensor data and user priority values. The control system modifies machine operations on-the-fly to balance productivity and treatment quality according to changing field conditions and user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as speed, spray rate, and other treatment parameters based on sensor data and user priorities. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system optimizes the trade-off between productivity and treatment quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the farming machine applies treatment product generously to improve treatment quality, then treatment quality increases, but treatment product savings deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment qualityVSAvoidtreatment product savings
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system adjusts treatment parameters such as spray rate, application timing, and dosage based on sensor data detecting plant conditions, weed presence, or other field variables. This allows precise control of treatment product application to achieve quality while minimizing waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies treatment product selectively based on local field conditions detected by sensors. Different areas receive different treatment intensities according to actual needs, rather than uniform application, thereby improving quality where needed while saving product elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If the farming machine operates slowly to improve treatment quality, then treatment quality increases, but farming machine productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment qualityVSAvoidfarming machine productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts speed and other operational parameters based on real-time sensor data and user priority values. When treatment quality is prioritized, the system slows down; when productivity is prioritized, the system increases speed, creating an adaptive balance between the two competing objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides real-time monitoring and adjustment capabilities, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user prioritiesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensor data collection and feedback loops that continuously monitor field conditions and machine performance. This feedback enables real-time adjustments to operational parameters, improving adaptability while the modular architecture helps manage complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system serves multiple functions: it monitors sensor data, processes user priority inputs, adjusts operational parameters, and provides real-time feedback. By consolidating these functions into a unified control platform, the system achieves high adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4541168A1User priorities for performing farming actions
Publication Date: 2025.04.23 DEERE & CO
  • EP4541168A1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4541168A1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4541168A1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

Some embodiments relate to a control system sending for display a first user interface requesting user priority values for treatment metrics. The control system receives, as input from a user interacting with the first user interface, user priority values. The control system operates the farming machine according to the user priority values. Based on sensor data generated as the farming machine operates in the field, the control system determines actual values of the treatment metrics. The control system sends for display on the client device a second user interface including the actual values for the treatment metrics. The control system receives updated user priority values from the client device for the treatment metrics. The updated user priority values are received as input from the user interacting with the second user interface. The control system updates operation of the farming machine according to the updated user priority values.