Fast Fault Current Limiter with Semiconductor Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electro-mechanical circuit breakers allow high fault currents to flow for a prolonged period due to their slow trip action, potentially damaging downstream equipment, and existing AC current limiting techniques are not practical for power dissipation or directly applicable from DC switch-mode regulators.

Innovation Solution

A fault current limiter comprising a small inductor in series with the load, a fast current sensor, and semiconductor switches that oscillate to maintain current around a threshold value, limiting fault currents with low power dissipation and preventing damage to downstream equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional electro-mechanical circuit breakers are used for over-current protection, then the device structure is simple and reliable, but the trip time is slow (milliseconds) allowing high fault currents to damage downstream equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip timeVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical trip mechanism of conventional circuit breakers with an electronic control system using semiconductor switches (MOSFETs or IGBTs). The controller detects over-current conditions and commands the semiconductor switches to open the circuit electronically, achieving microsecond-level response times instead of millisecond-level mechanical operation. This substitution of mechanical action with electronic control resolves the contradiction between fast response and structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamically controllable semiconductor switches that can be rapidly turned on and off by control signals from the controller. Unlike fixed mechanical breakers, these switches can adjust their state instantaneously based on real-time current conditions, enabling the system to respond dynamically to fault conditions with microsecond precision while maintaining a relatively simple overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If series resistance is used to limit fault current, then the fault current is reduced, but the power dissipation becomes enormous

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault current magnitudeVSAvoidpower dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic switching action of semiconductor switches to limit fault current rather than continuous resistance. The controller periodically opens and closes the semiconductor switches during fault conditions, allowing current to be limited to safe levels while the switches remain closed most of the time. This periodic interruption limits the integral of I²t (energy let-through) without requiring continuous power dissipation, thus resolving the contradiction between current limiting and energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the current-limiting function from passive resistance elements and implements it through active semiconductor switching. Instead of using a large series resistor that would continuously dissipate power, the system uses the semiconductor switches to actively control and limit current flow only when necessary, removing the need for continuous energy dissipation while maintaining effective fault current limitation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If fast-acting fuses are used to reduce let-through energy, then the trip time is reduced, but downstream equipment must still be designed to tolerate high A2S let-through

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelet-through energy reductionVSAvoiddownstream equipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a current sensor that provides real-time feedback to the controller about the actual current flowing through the circuit. The controller uses this feedback to precisely control the semiconductor switches, opening them when current exceeds safe thresholds and closing them when current returns to normal levels. This closed-loop feedback control enables the system to limit let-through energy to levels that protect downstream equipment without requiring downstream components to be oversized for extreme fault conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If AC semiconductor switches are used instead of DC switch-mode regulators, then the technique can be applied to AC power circuits, but new challenges arise in handling inductor flyback EMF and high frequency suppression

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAC application capabilityVSAvoidflyback EMF handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a diode bridge rectifier as an intermediary component that converts the AC input to DC, allowing the use of DC-oriented switch-mode control techniques in an AC power circuit. The rectifier acts as a mediator between the AC source and the DC-based semiconductor switching control, enabling the application of well-understood DC switch-mode regulator principles to AC circuits while managing the complexities of AC-to-DC conversion and flyback EMF handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively limits fault currents to a predetermined value, reducing damage to downstream equipment and preventing overheating, while allowing for efficient operation with minimal power loss, thus enhancing electrical safety and equipment protection.

Implementation Method 1

a small inductor in the 50 uH region in series with the output to the load for limiting the rate of increase of load current output during fault conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a fast current sensor for sensing the instantaneous inductor current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic sensing: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

a fast-operating series AC switch for opening the supply path to the inductor in response to the sensed inductor current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical switching:

Implementation Method 4

The inductor energy then decays into the load through the shunt switch until the current is less than the threshold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic energy dissipation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11070053B2Fast fault current limiter
Publication Date: 2021.07.20 KOOLBRIDGE ENERGY INC
  • US11070053B2 patent drawing
  • US11070053B2 patent drawing
  • US11070053B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fast-operating AC fault current limiter, to limit the fault current let through to downstream equipment during short circuit or low-impedance faults, comprises a series inductor to limit current rise time, a current sensor to sense the instantaneous current, a series AC semiconductor switch to interrupt current flow when it exceeds the maximum desired fault current, and a shunt AC semiconductor switch to catch inductor flyback voltage when the series semiconductor switch is opened. Each of the series and the shunt AC switches comprises two back-to-back MOSFETs. Inventive control of timing of the individual MOSFETs obviates the need for exact simultaneous timing of opening the series switch and closing the shunt switch, which is otherwise required to avoid short circuits.