Threaded Fastener Head Markings for Torque Specification Recall

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current databases and tools for threaded mechanical fasteners lack comprehensive information on tightening specifications, leading to errors during maintenance and repair, such as incorrect fastener reuse, misinterpretation of thread direction, and improper torque application, due to incomplete or obscured markings on fasteners.

Innovation Solution

A system that stores and recalls tightening specifications on threaded fasteners using debossed patterns, which can be read manually or electronically, providing essential information like torque requirements, thread direction, and thread locking presence, and is integrated into torque tools for automated control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If comprehensive tightening specifications are stored on fasteners, then information completeness is improved, but fastener complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetightening specification informationVSAvoidfastener marking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses debossed patterns that create visual contrast through light reflection differences. The debossed markings form light and dark regions that can be easily distinguished, providing clear visual information without adding physical complexity to the fastener structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent encodes tightening specifications in a two-dimensional debossed pattern on the fastener head surface. This allows comprehensive information storage in a compact format that doesn't increase the fastener's dimensional complexity, fitting within the existing fastener geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If debossed patterns are used for storage, then readability is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking readabilityVSAvoidfastener manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex multi-step marking processes with a single debossing operation. The debossed pattern is created through mechanical deformation of the fastener head surface during or after forming, eliminating the need for separate marking steps and reducing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The debossed pattern is incorporated into the fastener manufacturing process itself, creating the information storage feature as part of the base forming operation. This preliminary integration means the marking is created alongside the fastener structure rather than as a separate post-processing step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If automated tool control is implemented, then tightening accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque application accuracyVSAvoidtool control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback system where the optical scanner reads the debossed pattern on the fastener, the controller decodes the tightening specifications, and the controlled tool applies the exact torque required. This closed-loop feedback ensures accurate torque application while automating the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an optical scanner and controller as intermediaries between the fastener information and the torque tool. These components translate the debossed pattern into actionable torque commands, enabling automated control without requiring direct complex integration between the fastener and tool.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of information

If multiple tightening specifications are stored, then information completeness is improved, but storage space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetightening specification detailsVSAvoidfastener head surface
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent encodes multiple tightening specification parameters (torque value, thread direction, locking presence, sequence information) into a compact debossed pattern using variations in dot presence, position, and arrangement. This efficient encoding allows comprehensive information storage in a minimal surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a two-dimensional array of debossed dots to encode multiple specification parameters simultaneously. By utilizing spatial arrangement and presence/absence patterns in the debossed matrix, the system stores comprehensive tightening information without requiring proportional increases in surface area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11828316B2Storage, recall, and use of tightening specifications on threaded mechanical fasteners
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 MANTE DAVID M
  • US11828316B2 patent drawing
  • US11828316B2 patent drawing
  • US11828316B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surface marked threaded fastener comprising an elongated and threaded shaft and a head at one end of the elongated and threaded shaft; said head comprising on a surface contacting face a readable matrix comprising a dot pattern, said dot pattern defining a tightening specification.