Performance Fatigability Index via Accelerometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of objective, validated tools to measure performance fatigability among older adults, particularly in non-clinical populations, which hinders the understanding and management of fatigue-related issues.

Innovation Solution

The development of systems and methods to calculate performance fatigability indices using raw accelerometry data from triaxial accelerometers, specifically by analyzing gait cadence trajectories during walking tasks to quantify performance decrements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional subjective measures (questionnaires) are used to assess fatigability, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of administrationVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective questionnaire-based assessment with objective accelerometer-based measurement systems. The accelerometer captures raw acceleration data during walking tasks, which is then processed to generate performance fatigability indices, eliminating reliance on subjective self-reporting while maintaining ease of administration through automated data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces accelerometers as intermediary devices that objectively measure gait parameters during walking tasks. These devices serve as mediators between the subject's physical performance and the assessment process, capturing quantitative data on gait speed, cadence, and variability without requiring subjective input from the subject.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If simple gait speed measurement is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of measurement toolVSAvoidperformance assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the assessment into multiple gait parameters (gait speed, gait cadence, gait variability) measured across different phases of a walking task (initial, middle, final portions). This segmentation allows comprehensive performance fatigability assessment using relatively simple accelerometer devices, capturing temporal changes in multiple dimensions of gait performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic walking tasks with defined phases (initial, middle, final portions) to elicit and measure performance changes over time. By structuring the assessment as periodic cycles of walking followed by data analysis, the system captures temporal patterns of performance deterioration without requiring complex continuous monitoring equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive gait analysis is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary processing of raw accelerometer data during or immediately after the walking task, converting acceleration signals into gait parameters (speed, cadence, variability) in real-time or near-real-time. This preliminary action reduces the complexity and time required for subsequent analysis, enabling comprehensive gait analysis without excessive processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts key gait parameters (gait speed, gait cadence, gait variability) from comprehensive raw accelerometer data, focusing analysis on the most informative metrics. By extracting and prioritizing specific parameters that best indicate performance fatigability, the system achieves high measurement precision while reducing processing time compared to analyzing all available data dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250114019A1Systems and methods for performance fatigability index
Publication Date: 2025.04.10 UNIV OF PITTSBURGH OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYST OF HIGHER EDUCATION
  • US20250114019A1 patent drawing
  • US20250114019A1 patent drawing
  • US20250114019A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for calculating performance fatigability measures for subjects based on raw accelerometry data are described herein. An example method includes receiving raw accelerometry data, where the raw accelerometry data is collected from a subject during a walking task. The method further includes analyzing the raw accelerometry data to calculate a performance fatigability index for the subject based on the raw accelerometry data. Optionally, the subject is an aging human adult.