Faucet Handle Detents for Preset Water Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional water faucets waste water due to users being unaware of the flow rate, leading to excessive consumption, and existing solutions like aerators and mechanical modifications are not intuitive or cost-effective, necessitating a system that stimulates conscious water usage with tactile and visual feedback.

Innovation Solution

A faucet control system with a tactile feedback mechanism that allows users to adjust water flow rates from 0% to 100% in pre-set positions (33%, 66%, and 100%) through a lever or knob, providing intuitive control with minimal consumer impact and compatibility with existing faucets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If conventional faucets are used without flow control, then ease of operation is maintained, but water consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater consumptionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous flow control range is segmented into discrete preset positions (e.g., 0%, 33%, 66%, 100% flow rates) using detent mechanisms. This segmentation allows users to select appropriate flow rates for different tasks, reducing water consumption while maintaining operational simplicity through tactile feedback at each preset position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The faucet incorporates tactile feedback mechanisms (detents, clicks, or visual indicators) that provide immediate feedback to users when the handle reaches preset flow rate positions. This feedback stimulates conscious consumption by making users aware of the selected flow rate, enabling them to choose lower flow rates when appropriate without compromising ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of substance

If aerators or mechanical flow restrictors are installed, then water flow rate is reduced, but consumer acceptance decreases due to lack of adjustability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater flow rateVSAvoidadjustability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The faucet system transitions from static flow restriction (fixed aerators) to dynamic flow control with multiple adjustable preset positions. Users can dynamically select the appropriate flow rate based on task requirements, providing adaptability while maintaining water conservation benefits. The detent mechanism enables discrete adjustment between preset flow rates without requiring continuous manual adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Loss of substance

If mechanical modification of valve mechanism is implemented, then preset flow rates are achieved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater flow rate controlVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve mechanism is modified with segmented detent features that create discrete preset positions. This segmentation approach is simpler than continuous adjustment mechanisms, as it uses straightforward mechanical elements (detents, springs, cam surfaces) to achieve multiple fixed flow rate positions, reducing overall device complexity while providing effective flow control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detent mechanism automatically maintains the handle at preset positions through mechanical engagement, eliminating the need for additional actuators, motors, or electronic controls. The spring-loaded detents self-engage at predetermined positions, providing preset flow rate control through purely mechanical means that are simple to manufacture and maintain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of substance

If maximum flow rate is always available, then consumer satisfaction is maintained, but water conservation goals are not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater conservationVSAvoidconsumer satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The faucet provides dynamic flow rate selection with preset positions ranging from low (33%) to maximum (100%) flow rates. Users can dynamically adjust the flow rate based on task requirements, maintaining consumer satisfaction when high flow is needed while enabling water conservation during routine tasks. The tactile feedback at each preset position makes flow rate selection intuitive and satisfying.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the flow rate parameter to discrete preset values (0%, 33%, 66%, 100%) rather than allowing continuous adjustment. This parameter discretization simplifies user decision-making and stimulates conscious consumption by presenting clear options, while still providing maximum flow rate when needed for consumer satisfaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11867300B2Water conservation faucets
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 NOTCH2O LLC
  • US11867300B2 patent drawing
  • US11867300B2 patent drawing
  • US11867300B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A water conservation faucet seamlessly integrating a tactile feedback mechanism into existing faucets to spur user controlled pre-set water flow rate, energy conservation, and cost savings. During movement of the handle, the user receives tactile feedback through the handle indicating the position of the handle as it moves from one pre-set position to the next. In addition to tactile feedback, the handle provides visual feedback to the user as the handle remains in the fixed position until the user chooses to move handle to another position.