Fault Operation Control for Heterogeneous In-Vehicle Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In-vehicle systems with multi-device configurations, particularly heterogeneous setups, face challenges in maintaining sustainability when faults occur, as existing fail operation mechanisms are designed for homogeneous configurations with backup devices, leading to inadequate fault handling.

Innovation Solution

A fault operation control system and method that includes monitoring resource states across multiple devices, calculating difference information when a fault occurs, and executing countermeasures to optimize task allocation and ensure fail-safe or fail-soft operations by leveraging heterogeneous devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a homogeneous multi-device configuration with backup devices is used, then fault handling capability is improved, but adaptability to heterogeneous configurations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault handling capabilityVSAvoidadaptability to heterogeneous configurations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal fault handling mechanism that works across both homogeneous and heterogeneous multi-device configurations. The resource information comparison approach and countermeasure selection framework are designed to be configuration-agnostic, allowing the same system to handle faults whether devices are identical or different types, thus achieving multi-functionality across configuration scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of device configuration from homogeneous to heterogeneous while maintaining fault handling capability. By introducing resource information comparison and dynamic countermeasure selection based on actual device characteristics, the system adapts to parameter changes in device heterogeneity without losing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If resource monitoring and comparison mechanisms are implemented, then fault response accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault response accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of monitoring and comparison system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each device in the multi-device system independently monitors its own resource states and stores resource information locally. This self-service approach eliminates the need for a centralized monitoring system, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining accurate fault detection capability through local resource state tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-stores resource information for each device before faults occur. When a fault happens, the pre-stored information is immediately available for comparison and countermeasure selection, eliminating the need for complex real-time analysis and reducing response time without requiring complex monitoring infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If dynamic task reallocation is performed upon fault detection, then system sustainability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem sustainabilityVSAvoidfault response and reallocation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores resource information for all devices before faults occur. When a fault is detected, the fault determination unit can immediately compare resource states and select appropriate countermeasures using pre-stored data, avoiding time-consuming real-time analysis and enabling rapid task reallocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors resource states and provides feedback to the fault determination unit. This feedback mechanism enables the system to detect faults promptly and trigger reallocation only when necessary, balancing system sustainability with minimal processing time loss by avoiding unnecessary reallocation operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12468587B2Fault operation control system, fault operation control method, non-transitory computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP
  • US12468587B2 patent drawing
  • US12468587B2 patent drawing
  • US12468587B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device state monitoring unit monitors a state related to use of a resource of a first device and stores monitoring information during a normal operation. A device state monitoring unit monitors a state of a second device and stores monitoring information. A comparison unit calculates difference information by comparing hardware resource information of the second device used by a task that is executed by the second device before occurrence of a fault with resource information of the first device based on the stored monitoring information, when it is detected that the fault occurs in the second device. A processing determination unit determines and executes a countermeasure method for a fault operation according to the calculated difference information.