Solid-State Fault Current Limiting for Breaker Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical fault protection systems, such as electro-mechanical circuit breakers (EMCBs) and solid-state circuit breakers (SSCBs), struggle to effectively manage fast-rising fault currents in DC systems, leading to unmanageable fault current levels and loss of breaker coordination, with EMCBs being cost-effective but slow and SSCBs being expensive.

Innovation Solution

A solid-state switching device (SSSD) with semiconductor devices and a voltage clamping circuit is used to maintain fault current at a threshold for a defined period, allowing downstream circuit breakers to open and clear faults, while using a controller to send gate command signals for selective operation without pulse width modulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If electro-mechanical circuit breakers (EMCBs) are used for fault protection, then cost is reduced, but operating speed becomes too slow to interrupt fast-rising DC fault currents

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidoperating speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments fault protection into two levels: upstream SSCB for fast-rising faults and downstream EMCBs for localized faults. This segmentation allows each breaker type to operate in its optimal performance range, with the SSCB providing backup protection when EMCBs cannot interrupt faults quickly enough

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The upstream SSCB acts as an intermediary backup protection device that activates when downstream EMCBs fail to clear faults in time. It provides a intermediate solution between relying solely on slow EMCBs and deploying expensive SSCBs throughout the entire system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If solid-state circuit breakers (SSCBs) are used for fast fault interruption, then operating speed is improved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating speedVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the use of SSCBs to only the upstream position where they provide backup protection, rather than deploying them throughout the entire distribution system. This selective placement minimizes the number of expensive SSCBs needed while maintaining fast protection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The upstream SSCB is designed with excessive capability to handle the worst-case scenario of fast-rising faults that downstream EMCBs cannot clear. It provides more protection than locally needed but ensures system-wide safety against severe faults

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If downstream circuit breakers are relied upon to clear faults, then system cost is reduced, but breaker coordination is lost when they cannot switch open in time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem costVSAvoidbreaker coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The upstream SSCB continuously monitors downstream breaker performance and fault conditions. When it detects that a downstream EMCB has failed to clear a fault within the expected time frame, it automatically activates to provide backup protection, maintaining system reliability through feedback-driven coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The upstream SSCB is pre-positioned and pre-configured to provide immediate backup protection before downstream faults can escalate. Its presence as a pre-established safety net ensures that coordination is maintained even when downstream breakers fail to act in time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4601138A1Fault current limiting solid-state switching device
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • EP4601138A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4601138A1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4601138A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Systems and devices for providing fault current limiting protection in a power circuit may include a solid-state switching device (SSSD) including at least one switch device including a semiconductor device, a voltage clamping circuit connected in parallel with the at least one switch device, and one or more circuit breakers connected in series with the SSSD. The at least one switch device may include a second semiconductor device. The at least one switch device may include a first switch device and a second switch device. The fault current limiting protection includes, to enable clearing the fault, opening one of the switch devices to maintain the electric current at a threshold for a defined period of time, and opening, in response to failing to clear the fault, the other switch device to interrupt the electric current between a power source and electrical load(s) connected to the power circuit.