Automated Fault Isolation System for Managed Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current network monitoring systems face challenges in efficiently detecting and resolving faults due to overwhelming volumes of alarm reports, leading to prolonged downtime and increased costs, especially in large modern networks where manual processing is cumbersome and often requires human intervention.

Innovation Solution

An automated fault isolation and recovery system that transmits notification configurations to user interfaces, receives notification messages, and performs fault isolation and recovery based on workflow events, integrating with customer networks to streamline the process and reduce human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processing of alarm reports is used, then human analysis and decision-making is possible, but fault resolution time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault resolution speedVSAvoidmanual intervention level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the fault management system automatically executes fault isolation and recovery actions without requiring continuous human intervention. The automated workflow performs diagnostic actions, generates trouble tickets, and coordinates recovery efforts independently, transforming manual processing into autonomous operation while maintaining human oversight for complex decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring fault isolation procedures, pre-identifying affected customers, and pre-preparing recovery workflows before faults occur. When faults happen, these pre-established procedures enable immediate automated response, reducing resolution time compared to manual assessment and planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive notification options are provided to customers, then customer communication control is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification customization capabilityVSAvoidnotification system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The notification system employs dynamic configuration where customers can customize notification preferences through a user-friendly interface. The system adapts notification delivery methods, timing, and content based on customer-specific requirements stored in configuration data, allowing flexible customization without exposing complex underlying system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary notification management layer that sits between the fault detection system and customer communication channels. This intermediary handles the complexity of multiple notification methods (email, SMS, web portal), customer preference management, and message routing, shielding customers from system complexity while providing comprehensive communication options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If automated fault isolation is implemented, then fault resolution time is reduced, but initial system implementation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedowntime durationVSAvoidautomation system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated fault isolation system is segmented into distinct functional modules: fault detection module, impact analysis module, customer notification module, and recovery coordination module. Each module handles specific aspects of fault management independently, making the complex system more manageable and easier to implement incrementally. The segmentation allows organizations to deploy core automation functionality first and add advanced features later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7426654B2Method and system for providing customer controlled notifications in a managed network services system
Publication Date: 2008.09.16 ATLASSIAN US INC
  • US7426654B2 patent drawing
  • US7426654B2 patent drawing
  • US7426654B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach for supporting automated fault isolation and recovery is provided. A notification configuration option is transmitted to a browser interface utilized by a user associated with a customer network that is monitored by a service provider, wherein the user selects the notification configuration option to input notification information. The notification information is received, via the browser interface, from the customer. A notification message is received from a platform configured to create a workflow event in response to an alarm indicative of a fault within the customer network, wherein isolation and recovery of the fault is performed according to the workflow event, the notification message including information about the customer network during the fault isolation and recovery process. The notification message is transmitted in accordance with the stored notification information.